It's almost like they're targeted by certain folks!
https://www.usatoday.com/story/news...ws-biden-awake-meeting-israeli-pm/5655374001/
https://www.usatoday.com/story/news...ws-biden-awake-meeting-israeli-pm/5655374001/
Trumpers get duped again and again
- Thread starter Veer2Eternity
- Start date
I never saw an acknowledgment that whoever posted that had it wrong.
I can't even find the thread where they posted that video on here.
I can't even find the thread where they posted that video on here.
Seems like bleach/quaid is getting the whammy everytime he makes a new username. He must have really messed up.
70+ million voters for Trump.... and video viewed 130,000 times......0.1857 percent of Trump voters bought into this Social Media post that is if all of them believed it was real when they viewed it....Yikes then all Trump voters must be crazy.
I mean contrast that with over half of the Dems buying the Russian Collusion lie ....that led to a 40 million dollars investigation on that no proof was found, and later a impeachment with zero proof found or brought forth on that issue as well and guess what it was a lie that over half of Dems believed again....well I know what two percentages looks worse...and on what base. But continue on with your chuckles.....it is amusing and funny.
I mean contrast that with over half of the Dems buying the Russian Collusion lie ....that led to a 40 million dollars investigation on that no proof was found, and later a impeachment with zero proof found or brought forth on that issue as well and guess what it was a lie that over half of Dems believed again....well I know what two percentages looks worse...and on what base. But continue on with your chuckles.....it is amusing and funny.
There was collusion. Fact. (They gave their polling data to a russian 'dirty trickster')
Even the Senate GOP said as much.
Witnesses that could have proven it were pardoned by the clown.
The fact you can't even acknowledge that puts your squarely in the trumper camp.
Welcome!
Oh yes the Ole Polling data is the smoking gun....but no proof that Kilimnik gave data to anyone. Just pure speculation. If proof and evidence had been produced then the investigation would not of been a failure and waste of time.
See I'm in the I need proof and evidence camp....you clearly are not. You convict on whims and emotion.
No proof that their was collusion....No proof in election fraud...... See I'm consistent. I accept both outcomes until evidence is forth coming. You don't, it speaks volumes on how you think and operate.
I want data and evidence. You don't because it fits your partisan narrative.
And Did you even check into the Pardon's and how they could of backfired? In some cases if pardoned because you can't be charged you can be compelled to testify because the 5th amendment does not apply as you cannot incriminate yourself. Now this is not always the case and it's sort of dicey in how it's put into practice. But clearly the whole Pardon thing was again just a Media crutch.....
See I'm in the I need proof and evidence camp....you clearly are not. You convict on whims and emotion.
No proof that their was collusion....No proof in election fraud...... See I'm consistent. I accept both outcomes until evidence is forth coming. You don't, it speaks volumes on how you think and operate.
I want data and evidence. You don't because it fits your partisan narrative.
And Did you even check into the Pardon's and how they could of backfired? In some cases if pardoned because you can't be charged you can be compelled to testify because the 5th amendment does not apply as you cannot incriminate yourself. Now this is not always the case and it's sort of dicey in how it's put into practice. But clearly the whole Pardon thing was again just a Media crutch.....
Yeah I'll bet the Russians just happen to know how important those 7 states would be and how close the vote would be there.
Come on it was known who the battle ground states where and how important they where going to be. Most Polls are public and published. Sure each party/Candidate does internal polling but is that really the magic pill to getting elected or swaying a election. If that was the case the Russians could just do their own polling through a third party.
Completely agree MGHS. Why do you answer this troll? He doesn't want to talk policies or philosophies because what he stands for is a joke. He's far from the old Democrats like 'Give em hell' Harry and 'Ask not what your country can do for you...' Kennedy. Now it's 'let's be politically correct so we don't offend the few' and 'Demand that your country take care of you by communistic redistribution ideology'. These libtards have their head so far up CNN's backside they can think for themselves. All they have is to throw emotional rocks because they policies and people they back are so far removed from a successful business or country. Trying to defend an administration that has opened our borders to such a degree that it puts our country in jeopardy. And every border agent agrees with that statement. Defending the way we withdrew from Afghanistan is pathetic. Backing the murder of over 600,000+ babies per year is so far beyond evil it's terrible. They're so offended over Trumps stupid tweet they couldn't see the America first policies so they voted in a moronic puppet with the most damaging policies our country has faced. And this is just a small sampling.
I grew up in the bars and if you would have come in taunting with these slaps you better be big or bad or you were about to get your butt handed to you. But now it's the keyboard bad boys that can say the most ignorant jargon and have no accountability as they flex their mouth muscles hiding behind a computer.
So you think Harry and JFK were the types of presidents you would be ok with?
How would you feel about the expansion of government under both of these men?
Truman's attempted expansion of the "New Deal" included guaranteed jobs, increased minimum wage. and a national health insurance system.
Kennedy may have said, "Ask not what your country can do for you..." But his "New Frontier" which became the cornerstone of Johnson's "Great Society" was a bonanza of liberal ideas and policies.
I am sure you would have been talking about how great they were.
Absolutely not. I'm not trolling by creating threads that have no purpose other than to pick a fight. Amicable discussion is healthy and needed. This isn't amicable or healthy. Also, I'm willing to come out from behind my computer to discuss whatever, whenever.
Agreed. Trying to create a bridge. At least these presidents were a far cry from the democratic policies today. I liked Truman's policies a little better than JFK's. Good balancing post. TY
I believe there is a divide in both parties. Both parties have a radical element that are in conflict with centrists The time is right for a viable, moderate third party. Can you imagine how Congress and the President would be forced to compromise if no party held a majority?
Trump was way more old school democrat than a conservative. He like to spend taxpayer money, he liked to expand big gov.......Ideals I hated about him. But at least he understood that China wasn't our friend. That a open border Policy was bad for America and the economy.....HE figured out that we needed to redistribute and arrange our NATO forces and make those countries start footing more of their defense bills....
I disliked his character....which sort of mirrored JFK's immoral womanizing. HE was ignorant and brash with his words/Tweets when it would of served him better to be more tactful. He had many many faults that he could of corrected and he would of been a much better president and got more done.
But he didn't, but one thing I never doubted about him...Trump was America first, maybe it was his hubris and pride. But he wanted America to be the leader and top Alpha dog in the pack. .....Current day Dem's are about a world of Nations and BS cooperation with foreign entities and powers who want nothing more than to see us fail. They are complicit with our demise as long as they maintain control.
Can't work in the current system....winner takes all in the elections. A new party can replace a old one but a third party will never last long.
I agree that both parties have less than tasteful elements....but what Dem's don't see is that the Radical element is becoming the controlling and majority element. I'm sure you will disagree, but if that is not the case why is Biden dancing so far to the left. He came into office as a Blue Dog Dem and now he is almost sitting on Bernie and the Squads lap.
It would be more difficult, though, of course, not impossible, for the fringes to have as much sway if it were a parliamentary democracy, as many of the founders wanted. Parties would be forced to compromise with other parties and sometimes some strange bedfellows would be made, but more people's interests would be served. A 2-party system can only have compromise for so long until, as now, polarization makes it practically and politically impossible.
100% agree. Congress has become so polarized that it is dysfunctional. No one dares step outside party boundaries on votes.
I was hoping the Libertarian Party would gain some traction. I remember reading their platform in the '16 campaign, and I agreed with much of it. But certainly not all. I don't recall details.
I do believe the time is right. There is division in both parties right now.
Similar threads
