ADVERTISEMENT

The American Dream according to Cards, MG and Invicto

The way I understand it the guy that robbed the store customer of his rifle got shot to pieces by multiple people so justice was served
 
The way I understand it the guy that robbed the store customer of his rifle got shot to pieces by multiple people so justice was served
You seem to forget the two innocent bystanders. But you always do. Perhaps if A wasn’t carrying a rifle around the store no one would be shot. Wonder why he left the scene? Uhhh, Yea.
 
You seem to forget the two innocent bystanders. But you always do. Perhaps if A wasn’t carrying a rifle around the store no one would be shot. Wonder why he left the scene? Uhhh, Yea.
You have no idea if the incident would of been better or worse with our without the Rifle.
 
Why didn’t he use a baseball bat?

 
I got distracted this morning after reading the article. I just wanted to point out that when I clicked on the article they were showing the live news from that station at the time. The news at the time was talking about an active shooting at the Galleria.
I just shook my head.
 
That is totally incorrect...the Amendment address a well regulated militia and the people aka indivi
You have no idea if the incident would of been better or worse with our without the Rifle.
You surely do not believe that. Just ask the doctors that treat those people and they'll tell you you're just flat our wrong!
 
What are you talking about? Again clearly you lack basic reading skills. He indicated no one would of been shot if he wasn't carrying a rifle....He has zero evidence that the rifle was the catalyst for the incident. Or if it would of gone better or worse or not happened at all.

How you go right to comparing gunshot wounds to what ever it was you are comparing it to is mind boggling. He or I never mentioned that.
 
Why didn’t he use a baseball bat?

He was high on drugs.....you can't make sense of why the mentally addled do what they do.
 
What are you talking about? Again clearly you lack basic reading skills. He indicated no one would of been shot if he wasn't carrying a rifle....He has zero evidence that the rifle was the catalyst for the incident. Or if it would of gone better or worse or not happened at all.

How you go right to comparing gunshot wounds to what ever it was you are comparing it to is mind boggling. He or I never mentioned that.
You said he has no idea if the incident would have been better or worse with or without the rifle. I said you should ask the doctors that treat those people.
I don't know what part of that you can't understand genius boy. The docs will tell you wounds from that rifle are much worse than those from a pistol.
 
You seem to forget the two innocent bystanders. But you always do. Perhaps if A wasn’t carrying a rifle around the store no one would be shot. Wonder why he left the scene? Uhhh, Yea.
You seem to forget the two innocent bystanders. But you always do. Perhaps if A wasn’t carrying a rifle around the store no one would be shot. Wonder why he left the scene? Uhhh, Yea.

Which one was the good guy with the gun? I’m so confused.
Why didn’t he use a baseball bat?

Sheriff said he was a meth addict with a "history" who thought people were after him . Guy should have been locked up in prison where he belonged
You said he has no idea if the incident would have been better or worse with or without the rifle. I said you should ask the doctors that treat those people.
I don't know what part of that you can't understand genius boy. The docs will tell you wounds from that rifle are much worse than those from a pistol.
well duh

wounds from damn near any rifle are worse than a wound from almost any pistol.

BTW the military is replacing the .223 M4 rifle platform with a new 6.8mm weapon because the .223 is ineffective in modern combat situations. So Since it will no longer be used by the military the "weapon of war" bs kind of goes away

$6.8 Billion dollars worth of new rifles for the boys to play with!!!!
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: quaid1776forlife
You said he has no idea if the incident would have been better or worse with or without the rifle. I said you should ask the doctors that treat those people.
I don't know what part of that you can't understand genius boy. The docs will tell you wounds from that rifle are much worse than those from a pistol.
You interjected that into the discussion that wasn't part of the OP. Try to stay on task, you have a strange thing of throwing out some random non-related subject as part of the OP. Again Treating people has nothing to do with the factors of the Incident which was the original point.
 
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest posts

ADVERTISEMENT