Which one was the good guy with the gun? I’m soThe way I understand it, the guy that robbed the store customer of his rifle got completely shot full of holes by multiple people so justice was served
You seem to forget the two innocent bystanders. But you always do. Perhaps if A wasn’t carrying a rifle around the store no one would be shot. Wonder why he left the scene? Uhhh, Yea.The way I understand it the guy that robbed the store customer of his rifle got shot to pieces by multiple people so justice was served
You have no idea if the incident would of been better or worse with our without the Rifle.You seem to forget the two innocent bystanders. But you always do. Perhaps if A wasn’t carrying a rifle around the store no one would be shot. Wonder why he left the scene? Uhhh, Yea.
That is totally incorrect...the Amendment address a well regulated militia and the people aka individuals.
This might be the best 2nd amendment gotcha quote ever
That is totally incorrect...the Amendment address a well regulated militia and the people aka indivi
You surely do not believe that. Just ask the doctors that treat those people and they'll tell you you're just flat our wrong!You have no idea if the incident would of been better or worse with our without the Rifle.
There is no 2A gotcha inalienable rights cannot be taking away.This might be the best 2nd amendment gotcha quote ever
commit a felonyThere is no 2A gotcha inalienable rights cannot be taking away.
He was high on drugs.....you can't make sense of why the mentally addled do what they do.Why didn’t he use a baseball bat?
Sheriff: Boy, 8, killed as man shoots randomly at cars
An 8-year-old boy visiting South Carolina from New Hampshire was shot and killed by a man randomly firing a gun at passing cars from woods near his house, authorities said. Quarius Naqua Dunham died Sunday, a day after he was struck in the neck by a bullet while riding on a rural road in...news.yahoo.com
The supreme court determined that 2A is a individual right and not a civil or civic right..commit a felony
Oh wait.
Wrong again trumpboy
it isn't inalienable.The supreme court determined that 2A is a individual right and not a civil or civic right..
Supreme Court turns away disputes over firearms ban for nonviolent felons
Three people barred from possessing firearms under federal law because of nonviolent felony convictions said the ban violates the Second Amendment.www.cbsnews.com
You said he has no idea if the incident would have been better or worse with or without the rifle. I said you should ask the doctors that treat those people.What are you talking about? Again clearly you lack basic reading skills. He indicated no one would of been shot if he wasn't carrying a rifle....He has zero evidence that the rifle was the catalyst for the incident. Or if it would of gone better or worse or not happened at all.
How you go right to comparing gunshot wounds to what ever it was you are comparing it to is mind boggling. He or I never mentioned that.
You seem to forget the two innocent bystanders. But you always do. Perhaps if A wasn’t carrying a rifle around the store no one would be shot. Wonder why he left the scene? Uhhh, Yea.
You seem to forget the two innocent bystanders. But you always do. Perhaps if A wasn’t carrying a rifle around the store no one would be shot. Wonder why he left the scene? Uhhh, Yea.
Which one was the good guy with the gun? I’m so confused.
Sheriff said he was a meth addict with a "history" who thought people were after him . Guy should have been locked up in prison where he belongedWhy didn’t he use a baseball bat?
Sheriff: Boy, 8, killed as man shoots randomly at cars
An 8-year-old boy visiting South Carolina from New Hampshire was shot and killed by a man randomly firing a gun at passing cars from woods near his house, authorities said. Quarius Naqua Dunham died Sunday, a day after he was struck in the neck by a bullet while riding on a rural road in...news.yahoo.com
well duhYou said he has no idea if the incident would have been better or worse with or without the rifle. I said you should ask the doctors that treat those people.
I don't know what part of that you can't understand genius boy. The docs will tell you wounds from that rifle are much worse than those from a pistol.
You interjected that into the discussion that wasn't part of the OP. Try to stay on task, you have a strange thing of throwing out some random non-related subject as part of the OP. Again Treating people has nothing to do with the factors of the Incident which was the original point.You said he has no idea if the incident would have been better or worse with or without the rifle. I said you should ask the doctors that treat those people.
I don't know what part of that you can't understand genius boy. The docs will tell you wounds from that rifle are much worse than those from a pistol.