ADVERTISEMENT

Sudden hard line on Iran—Art of the deal

Duck_walk

Well-Known Member
Oct 17, 2002
23,081
4,231
113
Via @anniekarni three days ago: "Mr. Trump pointed out to one person who spoke to him on the phone last week that he had been pressured to take a harder line on Iran by some Republican senators whose support he needs now more than ever amid an impeachment battle."
 
The definition of imminent must be different in DC.

Pompeo: “there were a series of imminent attacks, we don’t know when, we don’t know where.
 
Seriously, Maggie Haberman and the Failing New York Times! Here is a quote from the article, "
one person who spoke to him on the phone last week that he had been pressured to take a harder line on Iran by some Republican senators whose support he needs now more than ever amid an impeachment battle. He also indicated that one of his top motivations for the strike was to protect Israel."
Show me proof that is what Trump was thinking. This "one person" stuff, show me evidence from a real person and not a "one person".
Give me a link, to where Trump actually says "I did it to protect Israel." I don't see one!

Did that sound like miller? I wanted to capture his genius.

 
Seriously, Maggie Haberman and the Failing New York Times! Here is a quote from the article, "
one person who spoke to him on the phone last week that he had been pressured to take a harder line on Iran by some Republican senators whose support he needs now more than ever amid an impeachment battle. He also indicated that one of his top motivations for the strike was to protect Israel."
Show me proof that is what Trump was thinking. This "one person" stuff, show me evidence from a real person and not a "one person".
Give me a link, to where Trump actually says "I did it to protect Israel." I don't see one!

Did that sound like miller? I wanted to capture his genius.
Sounded like you had come around for a moment there.
Someone said that..... but that someone never says Trump told me.
 
That was the real “imminent threat”.....
OK, I will try and get you up to speed since you obviously swallow the New York Times.
This like one of 5 or 6 key points that are going around. There are all kinds of strained logic by the Democrat response and Media to turn this into a loss for Trump. Like for example the Democrat response to the plane tragedy is Collateral damage (theory), Passengers murdered by DT (theory), John Kerry, diplomacy was working until Trump abandoned it lies(theory).
For example, vast outbreaks of Iranian terrorism happened all over the region. Additional development of ballistic weaponry that Kerry promoted and lied to us about. The false claim that had Trump left the nuclear deal in place Iran would not develop nuclear weapons.
Finally, The Iran deal wasn't even a band-aid it was a misdirection and the Iran regime is cancer and somehow Obama Kerry had empowered the moderates.
The War Powers (theory) nonbinding initiative that Pelosi called Trump the aggressor. I do agree that Mike Lee is consistent in his interpretation of the War Powers in the Const. but Pelosi is just full of it. She supported a full scale war in Lybia like 5 minutes ago.
 
OK, I will try and get you up to speed since you obviously swallow the New York Times.
This like one of 5 or 6 key points that are going around. There are all kinds of strained logic by the Democrat response and Media to turn this into a loss for Trump. Like for example the Democrat response to the plane tragedy is Collateral damage (theory), Passengers murdered by DT (theory), John Kerry, diplomacy was working until Trump abandoned it lies(theory).
For example, vast outbreaks of Iranian terrorism happened all over the region. Additional development of ballistic weaponry that Kerry promoted and lied to us about. The false claim that had Trump left the nuclear deal in place Iran would not develop nuclear weapons.
Finally, The Iran deal wasn't even a band-aid it was a misdirection and the Iran regime is cancer and somehow Obama Kerry had empowered the moderates.
The War Powers (theory) nonbinding initiative that Pelosi called Trump the aggressor. I do agree that Mike Lee is consistent in his interpretation of the War Powers in the Const. but Pelosi is just full of it. She supported a full scale war in Lybia like 5 minutes ago.

Did you hear Jeh Johnson? It's only the people that are defending Obama's overall strategy with Iran, which includes the media. You know the ones that were not super exercised about Obama's drone war. Like why is Trump so mean killing the mullahs, a man legally identified as a terrorist? Yes, I remember Libya war where it ended with the ambassador dead, and the legitimate government ended up offshore governing from an oil tanker. It happened, I remember. If you ask the average American if we were at war with Libya? they are like what? It was 6 years ago. Then there's Chris Mathews, that guy compared the death of Soliemani to Elvis and Princess Diane.
Chris Murphy tweets, Trump is weak (when his war ended with the Embassy burning in Baghdad), then after the Iranians attacked the Embassy, he tweeted this is Trump's Benghazi. Then last night at his rally, Trump basically said this was not my Bengahzi because I am not a pansy.
 
Last edited:
Did you hear Jeh Johnson? It's only the people that are defending Obama's overall strategy with Iran, which includes the media. You know the ones that were not super exercised about Obama's drone war. Like why is Trump so mean killing the mullahs, a man legally identified as a terrorist? Yes, I remember Libya war where it ended with the ambassador dead, and the legitimate government ended up offshore governing from an oil tanker. It happened, I remember. If you ask the average American if we were at war with Libya? they are like what? It was 6 years ago. Then there's Chris Mathews, that guy compared the death of Soliemani to Elvis and Princess Diane.

Party leftists (Berners) ripped the hell out of Obama’s droning gone wild. Media and establishment members were cool with it.
Chris Matthews is an establishment Dem.

The repubs are usually great at staying on message but they blew this one. They have had 3 or 4 different stories in the past 3 days for why the General was assassinated.
When they briefed congress they didn’t say a thing about embassy bombings. Then the next day it’s one embassy according to Pompeo and then it became 4 from Trump.
People don’t believe Trump nor Pompeo at all.
 
People don’t believe Trump nor Pompeo at all.
I heard the Pompeo interview on CNN. I won't replay it but I will say, a President can kill a terrorist without a threat of imminence. Osama was not and Imminent threat. The intel on his whereabouts was not strong according to the accounts reported. A terrorist job is plan terrorism but it would be nice to get the reports confirming the terrorist's exact next move. My concern is the perception put forth that Trump Admin. are the aggressors.
 
I heard the Pompeo interview on CNN. I won't replay it but I will say, a President can kill a terrorist without a threat of imminence. Osama was not and Imminent threat. The intel on his whereabouts was not strong according to the accounts reported. A terrorist job is plan terrorism but it would be nice to get the reports confirming the terrorist's exact next move. My concern is the perception put forth that Trump Admin. are the aggressors.
It’s time the US became the aggressors. Bad guys who threaten us need the crap kicked out of them sooner and not later
 
Does that include Putin and Kim? It's hard for fat donnie to kick anything out of anybody when he's on his knees.
Those two men command nuclear weapons, not much you can do about it now short of nuclear war. You can thank Bill Clinton and Madeline Albright for drinking Champagne with the North Koreans and brokering their great deal to end North Korea’s nuclear program. They were both fools to believe the North Koreans.

We need to stop Iran now before they do the same thing and arm terrorists with nukes
 
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest posts

ADVERTISEMENT