You are correct. I googled it and the media gave me 12 articles to chose from. I wish they only gave happy feel good stories.Some people just can’t stand good news.
Local Texas news reports 20,000 megawatts of renewable energy of the record setting 81,000 megawatts.The Lone Star state invested in solar and have 3x the capacity they had last year. The fossil fuel behemoth has so far avoided the predicted rolling blackouts.
Tootsie McDuck, I was not nor am I disagreeing. Only stated the facts. I believe that we need wind and solar for exactly these reasons like Texas is seeing. But I do not believe it will ever totally replace fossil fuel with renewables.So………. it didn’t help at all?
What I read was in Sunday's WSJ. Read that one. The Wall Street Journal is a legit source.You are correct. I googled it and the media gave me 12 articles to chose from. I wish they only gave happy feel good stories.
What I read was in Sunday's WSJ. Read that one. The Wall Street Journal is a legit source.
I don't understand why people would be against solar power, it's like hating puppies or something.
Breaking news:BNN Bloomberg – Canada Business News, TSX Today & Interest Rates
Get the latest Canadian business news, TSX updates, interest rates and Bank of Canada coverage. Explore stock market investing and get expert financial insights on investment portfolio strategies.www.bnnbloomberg.ca
Nobody is against solar, but people now understand that it and Wind has been sold like Snake Oil as a replacement for our energy needs....which it isn't and probably never will be.What I read was in Sunday's WSJ. Read that one. The Wall Street Journal is a legit source.
I don't understand why people would be against solar power, it's like hating puppies or something.
Can you link to one of your 3242342342353532423 sources ...let's say a few people that realistically claim that wind and solar would be 100% of all energy?Nobody is against solar, but people now understand that it and Wind has been sold like Snake Oil as a replacement for our energy needs....which it isn't and probably never will be.
Can you link to one of your 3242342342353532423 sources ...let's say a few people that realistically claim that wind and solar would be 100% of all energy?
That's just something Big Oil uses to get you rubes to buy in.
Where did I put words in anyone's mouths??? I said People now understand that Green energy can't fully meet our needs. I never in anyway named anyone on this board at all in my reply.Literally no one on this board has ever stated or implied that we can get rid of all fossil fuels and go wind and solar only, but that doesn’t keep MG from talking down to everyone and putting words in our mouth. A very insecure individual.
Thanks Dr. PhilThe insecure and narcissistic personality types tend to personalize all lines of discussions and topics and then want to label their own deficiencies on others ie...scapegoating/projection.
So you have a 'can power most' and another using WATER which wasn't part of the convo.Study: wind and solar can power most of the United States | John Abraham
John Abraham: Wind, solar, and storage could meet 90–100% of America’s electricity needswww.theguardian.com
Les compagnies de combustibles fossiles risquent de gaspiller 2 mille milliards de dollars sur des projets non rentables
Les compagnies de combustibles fossiles risquent de gaspiller 2 mille milliards de dollars sur des projets non rentables Les gouvernements et les compagnies doivent aligner leurs plans avec la...carbontracker.org
100% renewable energy could power the world by 2030, experts say - The Weather Network
Experts say the potential for rapid transformation of the world’s energy system has a parallel in the speed with which cars replaced horses in the 1900s.www.theweathernetwork.com
Where did I put words in anyone's mouths??? I said People now understand that Green energy can't fully meet our needs. I never in anyway named anyone on this board at all in my reply.
The insecure and narcissistic personality types tend to personalize all lines of discussions and topics and then want to label their own deficiencies on others ie...scapegoating/projection.
So now your playing semantics that 90 to a 100 percent isn't doesn't fit the narrative we do away with all fossil fuels and as far as I know hydro power is considered green energy and green energy is part of the convo......So you have a 'can power most' and another using WATER which wasn't part of the convo.
Nice try, captain fail
Your welcome it's not hard to profile peoples psychological make up and axis traits from a myriad of responses.Thanks Dr. Phil
no you made a claim and tried to make an end run around the truth.So now your playing semantics that 90 to a 100 percent isn't doesn't fit the narrative we do away with all fossil fuels and as far as I know hydro power is considered green energy and green energy is part of the convo......