Where is Veers theory on this one? He says when Valle is good Ste Gen is not and when Valle was down SG was good. So what gives now?
Class 3 SG (630 students) lost by 29 to a class 1 school (151 students).
Is that a good class 3 school?
Valle has 51 boys on their roster out of appx 75 in school? Is there any other school in the state with that ratio of athletes to non-athletes? The class 3 school has 54 on their roster.
In '92 Valle beat Class 3 State Champ Ste. Genevieve. But that doesn't fit the narrative. Nor should I expect you to be educated on the teams. Ste. Genevieve is night and day at this point in the season while taking on Kenny Weik's/Weilers coaching. Could they beat Valle now? I don't know. But it would be a close game IMO. Valle is that good.
And that is a great ratio, every school should strive for that. Instead of complaining.
Yea we hear about 92 all the time during the playoffs. I'd say that was an outlier. Since then my 'narrative' holds true more often than not.
Sure that's a great ratio. Is there a single public school that's close? Why or why not?
Yea we hear about 92 all the time during the playoffs. I'd say that was an outlier. Since then my 'narrative' holds true more often than not.
Sure that's a great ratio. Is there a single public school that's close? Why or why not?
Just imagine if Marionville or Miller were able to get players from the entire county of Lawrence. If they could get some of the better players from Aurora or Mt. Vernon, to go along with the players they have, they would both be a force in Class 1 also. Being able to have the entire county of Ste. Genevieve to select their players from is a huge advantage. It doesn't matter if they recruit outside of the county or not, they have a bigger area to select their athletes from than any other Class 1 team in the state. Having a good coach and weight program just makes them that more impressive.
None in rural areas.No other private class 1 teams?
None in rural areas.
Valle also server St. Francois county IIRC. Least that's what their website said.
Nobody will change their mind on this. The kennys can't (or don't want to)understand why having the pick of the litter and staying in the smallest class might be an advantage. Has anyone on here accused Valle of recruiting? Please link those posts or shut up about it. Valle has a great coaching staff and kids that work their tails off but so do a bunch of other class 1 programs.
Has any Valle coach gone on to great success at a public school program? You'd think it'd happen due to the money difference. Since there's no advantage there.
Since 92, how many years has SG and Valle had concurrent success?
Yes you are simple mindedAre ya that simple minded you can't figure out why a private school has a higher participation rate?
Yes you are simple minded
lamar would kick the dog piss out of both of those teams anyway. Beat valle's a.. and slap st. gen
I laughed as I was walking out of the restroom during halftime of a webb city game a few back vs. St. Mary's. A st. Mary's fan was complaning saying Webb city is good because they recruit. This coming from a private school. I've seen and heard it about any school that is superior in a sport. I guess if it makes you feel better about yourself, blame something or someone. It can't be tat they work harder or have better coaching
lamar would kick the dog piss out of both of those teams anyway. Beat valle's a.. and slap st. gen
Does Ste. Genevieve count as public school success? Stolzer/Weiler. Bacon did well in public school as well.(It's not like either of these schools have gone through a lot of Coaches)
Do you expect both schools to be dominant at the same time all the time? Late 80's early 90's they both were really good. Not so much late 90's early 2000's. Ste. Gen. isn't going anywhere. And neither is Valle. So pay attention the next few years. The decline in Valle happened around the same time a coaching change occurred. But that doesn't calculate into your narrative either.
Bump?So those public schools won 5 straight and 6 of 8? Or anything CLOSE to that?Why or why not?
Bump?
Veer...no the assitant coaches who left Valle have not had that kind of success. But Bob Stolzer who went to Ste. Gen. public was a Hall-of-Famer and his teams had far more success at Ste. Gen. than any of his teams ever did at Valle. I had a pretty good run at a public school the last 5 years of my own career up at Southern Cal HS in Lake City, IA....and we had to go through some really good private schools (Algona Bishop Garrigan and Council Bluffs St. Albert) in the playoffs
I have already admitted that Valle and every private schools have some advantages..that is why in Missouri they have the 1.35 multiplyer (which they DON'T have in Iowa by the way...not sure about Kansas, Illinois, Arkansas, etc).
And my additional point is that SOME public schools have had VERY similar success to Valle's...and I repeatedly have given Webb City and Lamar as examples.
So I am not really sure what the point is of our discussion? Could Valle's Judd Naeger, Lamar's Coach Bailey, and Webb City's Coach Roderique go to just ANY school and duplicate the success they are having at their current schools? Maybe not...but where ever they went...I have a feeling they would develop really good teams and programs.
Is Valle only good because they are a "rural" private school as you suggest? No...if so...why doesn't their neighboring rivals to the North (St. Pius of Festus) and the South (St. Vincent of Perryville) have similar success? And why has Valle had lulls when they were not very good during times of a lot of Coaching turnover?
Are Naeger, Bailey, and Roderique only good because they are at great schools? No...they are all three great HS football Coaches.
Could they all three duplicate the success they are currently having at another school? They'd all be very successfull IMO...but having the same level of success somewhere else would be tough.
You and I both know that there some great football communities around the state...there are some that are historically horrible...and a whole lot in between.
I guess what strikes a nerve with me is when people attack Valle...because despite the advantages they have (as a private school)...they are doing it the right way with hard work and home grown kids.
They are not like a John Burroughs who graduates a Zeke Elliot...and then gets a "super talented move-in from the East Coast like John Molten the very next year.
Valle is not like some of the private schools in the Cities who can "cherry pick" the very best talent from the JFL's and Matthew's Dickey teams in a large metropolitan area...and even scholarship a few of them.
What Valle has done is amazing. Does being a private school help? Sure...but there is way more to it than that....Judd Naeger and his assistant coaches deserve a lot of credit.
What Webb City and Lamar have done is equally amazing. Are those public school communities pretty special? Obviously so...there is a GREAT HS football culture at all three places...but the Coaches at each of those schools also deserve a lot of the credit.
I am giving examples of three great programs...one private and two public...so what are we arguing about?
We agree on more things than we disagree. It takes a special combination to have a run like that. Complete buy-in, competent coaches that motivate and sheer talent level.
Valle doesn't cherry pick but the public school didn't make it out of districts again. And it's not like class 3 over there is murderers row.
Kenny isn't impressed by Lamar's history. I hope the Lamar coaches noted that.
Since no head coaches have gone from Valle to any great success elsewhere is it the kids? I'm sure they work hard and all..but were those kids just gone when valle was bad? I've coached at a few places and seen a lot..bad and good.
Talent wins. Even without good coaches you win some games . With good coaches it becomes special. Good coaching CAN overcome talent deficit and we all agree valle is well coached. They're also major talented and that talent gets DEVELOPED. So many places don't develop that talent and that's where I think valle, webb, kearney, harrisonville etc. are doing the right thing. I'm sure you can spot the good ones a mile away.
I don't think valle 'recruits' per se like a rockhurst or JB. I do think the good kids around there go to valle now to play football.
And like someone else posted, if you let every class 1 school pull from their whole county(and be able to limit enrollment) you're gonna have some tailkickers on the teams that have quality coaching staffs.
All of those examples were walk ons... Valle has had plenty of kids that COULD play at the D1 level (Tyler Hunt style). I get the point you're making, and don't completely disagree, but I think you're slightly underselling the type of players Valle has had.fair enough, Veer...but Valle has never had a Division I kid and has had very few Division II kids or even D-III/NAIA kids as far as college players.
Don't get me wrong...they have really good HS talent for a class I school...but probabably not to the degree that some people think.
Westran has two kids at Mizzou (Tyler Hunt and Zane Jacoby), Penny has the RB at Wyoming, Santa Fe had Gregory at Mizzou, Northwestern/Hughesville had Tim Barnes at Mizzou/Rams...There are small schools who have had D-I type kids...but there never has been one at Valle.
Now that being said...arguably the most decorated college player in Valle History, QB Jeremy Hoog (who was very good at SMS in the mid 90's link: https://www.questia.com/newspaper/1P2-32894884/former-valle-star-reaches-early-peak-in-smsu-s-opener) has a Junior High aged son who is reportedly already about 6'2" and super athletic...so maybe he can be the first in a couple of years.
All of those examples were walk ons... Valle has had plenty of kids that COULD play at the D1 level (Tyler Hunt style). I get the point you're making, and don't completely disagree, but I think you're slightly underselling the type of players Valle has had.
I think the biggest difference is on the line of scrimmage. I played offensive line in the MIAA and i have watched MANY offensive lineman from Valle that had the talent to play D2, but with the way recruiting works now, weren't tall enough to get a scholarship out of High School.
fair enough, Veer...but Valle has never had a Division I kid and has had very few Division II kids or even D-III/NAIA kids as far as college players.
Don't get me wrong...they have really good HS talent for a class I school...but probabably not to the degree that some people think.
Westran has two kids at Mizzou (Tyler Hunt and Zane Jacoby), Penny has the RB at Wyoming, Santa Fe had Gregory at Mizzou, Northwestern/Hughesville had Tim Barnes at Mizzou/Rams...There are small schools who have had D-I type kids...but there never has been one at Valle.
Now that being said...arguably the most decorated college player in Valle History, QB Jeremy Hoog (who was very good at SMS in the mid 90's link: https://www.questia.com/newspaper/1P2-32894884/former-valle-star-reaches-early-peak-in-smsu-s-opener) has a Junior High aged son who is reportedly already about 6'2" and super athletic...so maybe he can be the first in a couple of years.
Jeremy's boy really likes basketball and is pretty good...Is that even allowed in SG County??
As a former Lead Belter I am joking on this as my son played basketball against and with young Hoog before we moved.
Southern Cal Iowa? Please tell me you didn't have to deal with any Monahans on your teams (my in-laws).I left Valle after three years and had decent success at three public schools after leaving (Santa Fe, Ste. Gen Public, and Southern Cal HS in Lake City, IA...progressively a little better at each stop as I got older, wiser, and more experienced after a lot of trial-and-error.