ADVERTISEMENT

Republican Senators Dumped Stocks Ahead of Market Plunge

SadButTrue

Well-Known Member
May 30, 2001
4,552
477
83
Sen. Richard Burr, R-N.C., and Sen. Kelly Loeffler, R-Ga., dumped stock holdings worth millions ahead of the market plunge that began in February after they received briefings on the coronavirus, according to published reports Thursday.

Burr, the chairman of the Senate Select Committee on Intelligence, sold the stocks on Feb. 13, ProPublica reported, citing disclosure filings.

Loeffler began dumping shares Jan. 24, after a private briefing for senators from administration officials, including the CDC director and Anthony Fauci, the head of the National Institutes of Health, the Daily Beast reported.

Shares of the companies whose stocks she sold are down an average of 33%, since then, according to the report. Loeffler's sales totaled between $1,275,000 and $3,100,000, according to the report.

On Feb. 7, Burr wrote in an op-ed co-authored with Sen. Lamar Alexander, R-Tenn., that “the United States today is better prepared than ever before to face emerging public health threats, like the coronavirus, in large part due to the work of the Senate Health Committee, Congress, and the Trump Administration.”

Earlier Thursday, NPR reported that Burr offered a far more dire forecast in comments in late February to a private luncheon organized by the Tar Heel Circle.

He warned that travel restrictions, school closures and military involvement could all come to pass, as indeed they have.

The NPR report described the circle as “a nonpartisan group whose membership consists of businesses and organizations in North Carolina, the state Burr represents. Membership to join the Tar Heel Circle costs between $500 and $10,000.”

Burr took to Twitter Thursday to complain about the NPR report, calling it tabloid journalism.

A spokesman for his office told ProPublica that “Senator Burr filed a financial disclosure form for personal transactions made several weeks before the U.S. and financial markets showed signs of volatility due to the growing coronavirus outbreak.”

U.S. stock markets have seen the most abrupt move from all-time highs to bear market status (down 20%) in history over the past three weeks.

In 2012, Burr was one of only three senators to oppose legislation prohibiting insider trading by members of Congress.
 
It happened years ago. She isn’t going anywhere.
Let me be clear though Burr and Loeffer are scum if they knew and profited from it.
Oh I know. I was making light of how nice of a lady Pelosi is.

But yes, both need to go. Loeffer will be gone in Nov when she loses to Collins. So that will take care of her.
 
Oh I know. I was making light of how nice of a lady Pelosi is.

But yes, both need to go. Loeffer will be gone in Nov when she loses to Collins. So that will take care of her.

Feinstein also sold millions in biotech stock a few weeks ago so I imagine nothing happens to any of them.
 
  • Like
Reactions: millerbleach
Feinstein also sold millions in biotech stock a few weeks ago so I imagine nothing happens to any of them.
Don't care who did it. If they violated the law lock them up. You guys are so intent and making your answer with, "well he did it too", instead of saying "Feinstein did the same thing and they all should be locked up".
 
  • Like
Reactions: millerbleach
Don't care who did it. If they violated the law lock them up. You guys are so intent and making your answer with, "well he did it too", instead of saying "Feinstein did the same thing and they all should be locked up".
Feinstein short sold with inside info. Just as illegal, or unethical. All 4 should be locked up.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Arcola
This! It is illegal and should be treated as such. Removal from office is more than will happen but less than deserved.
According to what I saw today it is NOT against senate rules to do this. Of course they make their own rules sooo. As they say the power of the voters may have to take care of it, but we all know that probably won't happen in either party.
 
According to what I saw today it is NOT against senate rules to do this. Of course they make their own rules sooo. As they say the power of the voters may have to take care of it, but we all know that probably won't happen in either party.
Yeah. I don’t think it is technically illegal for them to do it but if they were private citizens they would go to jail for it or if they were a President they would get impeached for it.
 
According to what I saw today it is NOT against senate rules to do this. Of course they make their own rules sooo. As they say the power of the voters may have to take care of it, but we all know that probably won't happen in either party.

I heard yesterday that it was illegal but they changed the rules a while back (bipartisan......bipartisan doesn't equal good) to allow this.
 
Isn't this type of insider trading the same thing 60 Minutes nailed some congressmen for a couple years ago?
 
Members of Congress should only hold assets in blind trusts plus the basic index funds in their Federal employee benefits. The real scandal is that we allow them to trade stocks in the first place. Really, they should want to avoid the questions about how/why they are trading assets like this.
 
Not dense......obtuse.

Same difference.

ob·tuse
/əbˈt(y)o͞os,äbˈt(y)o͞os/
1.
annoyingly insensitive or slow to understand.

The adjective obtuse is good for describing someone slow on the uptake: "Don't be so obtuse: get with the program!" The adjective obtuse literally means "rounded" or "blunt," but when it's used for a person, it means "not quick or alert in perception" — in other words, not the sharpest tool in the shed.
 
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest posts

ADVERTISEMENT