The best thing is to ignore the news. We know what they're going to say before they say it.
Churchill had only had one media or news outlet , the newspapers. And journalism was more respectable back then.Churchill didn't tell lies to the British people.
So what's your favorite color?Churchill didn't tell lies to the British people.
Do British people call it soccer or football?Churchill didn't tell lies to the British people.
And journalism was more respectable back then.
Do the Washington Generals ever win?AND presidents were always more respectable than crude, rude trumpy.
Do you think Churchill ever publicly made fun of a disabled person?
Yes.Do the Washington Generals ever win?
Cool. What's your favorite pizza toppings?Yes.
All that legit basketball paid off once -- on Jan. 5, 1971, in Martin, Tennessee.
US identified cases are up 30-35% from Thursday to Sunday (and they grew by 2,000 from Sat to Sun, they didn't decline.) Data are also noisy from one day to the next; you can't draw conclusions on one day of data. There's also likely some lags in data reporting on weeks.looks like death count in New York is half of yesterday and overall new cases are less today in US? Not too shabby.
Missouri is up 600% over the last week.With so few tests being administered and a time lag in getting results, I don't think we can draw any conclusions at this point. If people get their stimulus checks and timely unemployment checks, not to mention most people are still working, I hope we can hold on a few more weeks. MO is a couple weeks from peaking.
or are they? We don't know how many people have it. No idea. How many have gone untested that have it? And how long has it been here?Missouri is up 600% over the last week.
Coincidentally I saw this today.or are they? We don't know how many people have it. No idea. How many have gone untested that have it? And how long has it been here?
Stats are only useful if they are reliable. And they aren't
It is true that looking at raw counts has a significant bias due to testing rate. But it's almost certainly true that Missouri has more sick people than it did a week or two ago.or are they? We don't know how many people have it. No idea. How many have gone untested that have it? And how long has it been here?
Stats are only useful if they are reliable. And they aren't
Yes. Colds, flus, and allergies are all in season still too. I’m not saying it isn’t going up... but that any percentage or tally is inaccurateIt is true that looking at raw counts has a significant bias due to testing rate. But it's almost certainly true that Missouri has more sick people than it did a week or two ago.
deaths are usually more accurate than anything else. There are bodies. Now, they're still generally underreported, as not everyone is tested and the system is just overwhelmed in some of these countries. How full your hospitals/ERs are is generally not a bad metric, either.Yes. Colds, flus, and allergies are all in season still too. I’m not saying it isn’t going up... but that any percentage or tally is inaccurate
I would guess they used the stats they have, not what they don't have.or are they? We don't know how many people have it. No idea. How many have gone untested that have it? And how long has it been here?
Stats are only useful if they are reliable. And they aren't
Yes...which shouldn't be used to make great conclusions. Think about how much the proposed death toll has gone up down and around? We have no idea on this stuff.I would guess they used the stats they have, not what they don't have.
Yes...which shouldn't be used to make great conclusions. Think about how much the proposed death toll has gone up down and around? We have no idea on this stuff.
That's my point. We don't need to act based on every whim and tally.
But, we can be cautious and responsible while we wait.