ADVERTISEMENT

Pelosi Doesn't Want to Talk About Her "Victory"

House Minority Leader Kevin McCarthy torched Pelosi for shutting down impeachment-related questions.

"I would think if Nancy Pelosi thought impeachment was so important that she had to put this before the American public ... the press conference the day after impeachment -- that she has weekly -- I thought she would have welcomed questions about impeachment," McCarthy said. "Unfortunately, she told you they were Republican talking points and she would not take your questions. I never thought a speaker would act that way.

"I guess, the only thing I could take from that is she’s embarrassed of it, she understands how weak it is, she understands her own criteria was not met, constitutionally it was not met, she probably failed on all parts," he said.
 
IDIOT!!!!
She knows what she's doing. Making people like you make a fool of yourself like she does trump. Hide and watch Grasshopper. Bahahaha
 
Maybe it's because the impeachment is an entirely political act, and they don't run the Senate. Bahahahaha. Republicans unanimously voted against it, and all but 3 commies voted for it.

Man, they cut into the Mask Singer last night with a bizarre split screen or I would have forgotten this was happening. Nobody cares except for the stupid media. Lol

I think Nancy is feeling solemnity, sadness, and somberness today. The theatrical stupidity is over the top. They've been praying that Trump will be struck by lightning for 3 years. Sure, they aren't excited. Sure.

I heard today the phony commnucrats recited the pledge of allegiance. The POA they want to ban in schools.
 
Maybe it's because the impeachment is an entirely political act, and they don't run the Senate. Bahahahaha. Republicans unanimously voted against it, and all but 3 commies voted for it.

Man, they cut into the Mask Singer last night with a bizarre split screen or I would have forgotten this was happening. Nobody cares except for the stupid media. Lol

I think Nancy is feeling solemnity, sadness, and somberness today. The theatrical stupidity is over the top. They've been praying that Trump will be struck by lightning for 3 years. Sure, they aren't excited. Sure.

I heard today the phony commnucrats recited the pledge of allegiance. The POA they want to ban in schools.
There is NO way to have impeachment but through the political arena. That's how the founders set it up, it ain't a court of law.
While we're talking about this I think it's high time the DOJ's position that a sitting president cannot be indicted get a challenge in the courts. There is at least one federal judge that says that stance is hogwash. Trump should be charged with the obstruction of justice that was laid out by Mueller who said he couldn't indict so he had nothing more to say about it.
 
There is NO way to have impeachment but through the political arena. That's how the founders set it up, it ain't a court of law.
While we're talking about this I think it's high time the DOJ's position that a sitting president cannot be indicted get a challenge in the courts. There is at least one federal judge that says that stance is hogwash. Trump should be charged with the obstruction of justice that was laid out by Mueller who said he couldn't indict so he had nothing more to say about it.

That doesn't mean this impeachment is not totally political calculation by the democrat party. Democrats new found fondness of the Constitution is a cheap power grab and it was rammed through by a mob.

According to the founders, Impeachment is for crimes. There are no crimes or impeachable offenses in the IA.

Impeachment is intended to be bi-partisan and fearing it could be used for Mob rule, the founders used the Senate for a trial with an SC Judge. Checks and Balances are cool in a Republic. BTW, we are a Republic, pure majority Democracies end up ruled by the mob. This is why we have the electoral college.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Veerman_12
There is NO way to have impeachment but through the political arena. That's how the founders set it up, it ain't a court of law.
While we're talking about this I think it's high time the DOJ's position that a sitting president cannot be indicted get a challenge in the courts. There is at least one federal judge that says that stance is hogwash. Trump should be charged with the obstruction of justice that was laid out by Mueller who said he couldn't indict so he had nothing more to say about it.
No on the Federal Judge's opinion. I've seen the 9th Circuit in action. They're corrupt. Let's not become a total banana Republic that throws all it's political leaders in prisons every time the Mob disagrees with them.
The Mueller report is garbage. Mueller was covering for his corrupt friends with his opinions. The Mueller investigation is based on a lie that never occurred and Russia, Putin's Puppet theory is a political hoax that has been totally dismantled and debunked.
 
Last edited:
No on the Federal Judge's opinion. I've seen the 9th Circuit in action. They're corrupt. Let's not become a total banana Republic that throws all it's political leaders in prisons every time the Mob disagrees with them.
The Mueller report is garbage. Mueller was covering for his corrupt friends with his opinions. The Mueller investigation is based on a lie that never occurred and Russia, Putin's Puppet theory is a political hoax that has been totally dismantled and debunked.
Yeah that's why a former WH aide says Trump said he knows Ukraine was the one that interfered with our election, he said he knows that because Putin told him. :eek:
 
  • Like
Reactions: Duck_walk
Yeah that's why a former WH aide says Trump said he knows Ukraine was the one that interfered with our election, he said he knows that because Putin told him. :eek:
So you agree that Mueller knew the dossier was bunk in 2017 and sat the information to interfere in the 2018 midterm elections? You knowwww. The election that lead to Fat DoNnies almost impeachment?
 
Yeah that's why a former WH aide says Trump said he knows Ukraine was the one that interfered with our election, he said he knows that because Putin told him. :eek:
What "former WH aide"??
How does he KNOW what Trump knows?
Where has Trump said Putin told him this?
I'll bet they said it on CNN.
 
What "former WH aide"??
How does he KNOW what Trump knows?
Where has Trump said Putin told him this?
I'll bet they said it on CNN.
I'll bet you a former WH aide is trying to get the truth out. If you think reporters give up their sources then you know some reporters that will never get another scoop on anything. You are one of the biggest conspiracy guys I've ever heard of, you think everything is fake news. A true blue Trumpster.
 
I'll bet you a former WH aide is trying to get the truth out. If you think reporters give up their sources then you know some reporters that will never get another scoop on anything. You are one of the biggest conspiracy guys I've ever heard of, you think everything is fake news. A true blue Trumpster.
No! You can't keep citing anonymous, second hand, they said on CNN, reports and then stand there dumbfounded someone calls you out on it.

You bet? Yeah, i'll run with that.
 
  • Like
Reactions: BigMODog
No! You can't keep citing anonymous, second hand, they said on CNN, reports and then stand there dumbfounded someone calls you out on it.

You bet? Yeah, i'll run with that.
Whatever you say oh Mosports god of the PC board. If you don't get quotes from unnamed sources in the political world you would get very little news at all to write about in DC. How many times have you heard that a LOT of pubs talk completely different about Trump's in private than they do in public. Why are they so afraid of this knot head? I've never seen anything like it in my life!
 
If you don't get quotes from unnamed sources in the political world you would get very little news at all to write about in DC.

On CNN that's true.
If it can't be double sourced by first hand knowledge you can't use it. That is the standard at legitimate news sources.
 
How many times have you heard that a LOT of pubs talk completely different about Trump's in private than they do in public. Why are they so afraid of this knot head? I've never seen anything like it in my life!
You are the only place I hear that. BUT, i'm not watching CNN either.
 
On CNN that's true.
If it can't be double sourced by first hand knowledge you can't use it. That is the standard at legitimate news sources.
It comes from newspapers most of the time so I guess it must be true.
 
The un-named sources that all hate Trump?
Why would it be true if it comes from a newspaper? I can list 20 newspapers that don't claim what you post.
Would that be the Miller Weekly Wipe, Mt. Vernon Daily News, Halltown Press, South Greenfield Gazette, Avilla News to name a few?
 
The un-named sources that all hate Trump?
Why would it be true if it comes from a newspaper? I can list 20 newspapers that don't claim what you post.
It doesn't matter what I say you think they don't checkout any of their sources before they print their stories. It might be people that hate Trump, and it might be because they are in loop and know what kind of crap he trying push off on this country. There will NEVER be anything I say that is true, or right, in your Trumpster eyes even when others on here and have done the research you so dearly love and it proves I was right. Just remember these people talking to reporters are people he has hired or they wouldn't be there. And HE was going to hire noting but the best.
 
It doesn't matter what I say you think they don't checkout any of their sources before they print their stories. It might be people that hate Trump, and it might be because they are in loop and know what kind of crap he trying push off on this country. There will NEVER be anything I say that is true, or right, in your Trumpster eyes even when others on here and have done the research you so dearly love and it proves I was right. Just remember these people talking to reporters are people he has hired or they wouldn't be there. And HE was going to hire noting but the best.
I just don't like anonymous sources who are supposed to be very dependable. A source is someone you can see and hear. You always have proof you heard that someone said they heard someone talking about. At least provide your source for the supposed undeniable hearsay.
 
People will put direct quotes from Trump in a post and you still claim he never said it or that’s not what he means. And it’s on video. So just STF-U. You are the dumbest, most uninformed POS I know.

So many acronyms. That's "tough" of you.
 
  • Like
Reactions: MIZZOU71
I just don't like anonymous sources who are supposed to be very dependable. A source is someone you can see and hear. You always have proof you heard that someone said they heard someone talking about. At least provide your source for the supposed undeniable hearsay.
I guess you don't read newspapers at all either, they will NOT give up their sources. The reporters know who their sources are, I don't. What is coming out in the big papers tomorrow shows up on the news the night before. I don't get it from the big city newspapers myself.
 
I'll bet you a former WH aide is trying to get the truth out. If you think reporters give up their sources then you know some reporters that will never get another scoop on anything. You are one of the biggest conspiracy guys I've ever heard of, you think everything is fake news. A true blue Trumpster.

News Flash: Barack Obama asked Ukraine to investigate his political rival's campaign manager. 3 Democrat senators asked Ukraine to investigate Trump. And the DNC solicited Ukraine's help to dig up dirt on Trump. And the media was silent about all of it. Fake news MSM not only spews propaganda and conspiracies, but it also covers by not covering.
 
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest posts

ADVERTISEMENT