New York Times Called out for Yellow Journalism

[MGHS]

Journalism watchdog chastises Pulitzer winners for Trump-Russia tales

An 18-month investigation by the liberal media watchdog Columbia Journalism Review has delivered a major black eye to The New York Times and other Pulitzer Prize winners for their stories about the Trump-Russia saga, finding “serious flaws” in their coverage and no acknowledgment that the...

www.washingtontimes.com

When the Liberal Columbia Journalism Review is calling out the Radical MuckRacking NYT as being biased liars and peddlers of propaganda you know things have gotten really bad.

And the press wonders why People of the world don't believe a word they say.....

 

[HomeyR]

Journalism watchdog chastises Pulitzer winners for Trump-Russia tales

An 18-month investigation by the liberal media watchdog Columbia Journalism Review has delivered a major black eye to The New York Times and other Pulitzer Prize winners for their stories about the Trump-Russia saga, finding “serious flaws” in their coverage and no acknowledgment that the...

www.washingtontimes.com

When the Liberal Columbia Journalism Review is calling out the Radical MuckRacking NYT as being biased liars and peddlers of propaganda you know things have gotten really bad.

And the press wonders why People of the world don't believe a word they say.....

It's muckraking...genius !

 

[Expect2Win]

It's muckraking...genius !

It's also crazy. The guy who claims to show evidence after evidence posts an article that's two major claims are that the NYT "tended to ignore facts that ran 'counter to the prevailing narrative.'” That narrative of course is what the Trumpers said. And the second claim is that the NYT "newsroom was shocked and caught 'flat-footed' when special counsel Robert Mueller told Congress that he wouldn’t pursue Mr. Trump’s ouster." Which is what pretty much everyone following the case thought.

 

[HomeyR]

It's also crazy. The guy who claims to show evidence after evidence posts an article that's two major claims are that the NYT "tended to ignore facts that ran 'counter to the prevailing narrative.'” That narrative of course is what the Trumpers said. And the second claim is that the NYT "newsroom was shocked and caught 'flat-footed' when special counsel Robert Mueller told Congress that he wouldn’t pursue Mr. Trump’s ouster." Which is what pretty much everyone following the case thought.

Totally agreed...Look where his article came from... The Washington Times. A publication that is totally to the right. I've always thought that "someone" cherry picks his sources. He claims not to defend Trump but...

 

[Veer2Eternity]

Totally agreed...Look where his article came from... The Washington Times. A publication that is totally to the right. I've always thought that "someone" cherry picks his sources. He claims not to defend Trump but...

He uses the sources that match his agenda. He doesn't give thought to anything. He just regurgitates his spoon fed talking points daily /nightly between bed pan boilings.

 

[MGHS]

Totally agreed...Look where his article came from... The Washington Times. A publication that is totally to the right. I've always thought that "someone" cherry picks his sources. He claims not to defend Trump but...

The times was just reporting on the Article by the Source.... you can read the whole thing if you want to put in the time.

 

[MGHS]

He uses the sources that match his agenda. He doesn't give thought to anything. He just regurgitates his spoon fed talking points daily /nightly between bed pan boilings.

The Source CJR is clearly not a right wing information spreader. I get it you can't actually debunk the Points made by the CJR so you have to try and discredit a news outlet The Wash. Times that picked up the Information and reprinted it.

So if I just regurgitate spoon fed talking points why do I source both the right and left. I linked a shorten highlight version.... because I doubted anyone would read the whole review... Of course it would be right leaning outlets that reported on the story as Left leaning outlets are not keen on this type of coverage. Google it and see what pops up.

The press versus the president, part one

<p>INTRODUCTION: ‘I realized early on I had two jobs’ The end of the long inquiry into whether Donald Trump was colluding with Russia came in July 2019, when Robert Mueller III, the special counsel, took seven, sometimes painful, hours to essentially say no. “Holy shit, Bob Mueller is not going...

www.cjr.org

 

[Veer2Eternity]

The Source CJR is clearly not a right wing information spreader. I get it you can't actually debunk the Points made by the CJR so you have to try and discredit a news outlet The Wash. Times that picked up the Information and reprinted it.

So if I just regurgitate spoon fed talking points why do I source both the right and left. I linked a shorten highlight version.... because I doubted anyone would read the whole review... Of course it would be right leaning outlets that reported on the story as Left leaning outlets are not keen on this type of coverage. Google it and see what pops up.

The press versus the president, part one

<p>INTRODUCTION: ‘I realized early on I had two jobs’ The end of the long inquiry into whether Donald Trump was colluding with Russia came in July 2019, when Robert Mueller III, the special counsel, took seven, sometimes painful, hours to essentially say no. “Holy shit, Bob Mueller is not going...

www.cjr.org

My point remains.

That same article was on every political board posted by the same trolls.

Be original for once.

 

[MGHS]

What point is that, I guess you must frequent other political boards? And Posting links to legit and unbiased information is trolling... that is really a warped view point. But narrow minded people tend to reject any logical challenge to their created world view narrative.

I googled daily news and that article and others citing that source came up? Since I don't frequent the CJR web site on a daily bases I was thankful that a quick google search allowed me to read articles about the subject. I gather a lot of information from Left and Right source by simply reading recent events or daily news articles posted by various organizations.

I understand that the CRJ report pokes holes in your Russian Collusion narrative so of course you are closed off to the subject and quickly went into attack mode going after the Source that reprinted the information from a left/liberal organization no less. You completely ignored the Subject, didn't mount a rebuttal to the information but instead went after the Vehicle that provided information to the public.



Maybe you can be original for once and actually engage as opposed to just throwing out meaningless disparaging comments.

 

[Veer2Eternity]

What point is that, I guess you must frequent other political boards? And Posting links to legit and unbiased information is trolling... that is really a warped view point. But narrow minded people tend to reject any logical challenge to their created world view narrative.

I googled daily news and that article and others citing that source came up? Since I don't frequent the CJR web site on a daily bases I was thankful that a quick google search allowed me to read articles about the subject. I gather a lot of information from Left and Right source by simply reading recent events or daily news articles posted by various organizations.

I understand that the CRJ report pokes holes in your Russian Collusion narrative so of course you are closed off to the subject and quickly went into attack mode going after the Source that reprinted the information from a left/liberal organization no less. You completely ignored the Subject, didn't mount a rebuttal to the information but instead went after the Vehicle that provided information to the public.



Maybe you can be original for once and actually engage as opposed to just throwing out meaningless disparaging comments.

You literally post the same thing as the bot-trolls on about 5 other forums.

Daily.

Verbatim. Same links. Same sources.

 

[bullitpdq68]

Hold on.......you are telling me there are other forums out there besides mosport?

 

[Expect2Win]

Hold on.......you are telling me there are other forums out there besides mosport?

I don't read or type fast enough to be on more than 1.

 

[3Rfan]

I don't read or type fast enough to be on more than 1.

I'm with ya on that Expect, I spend too much time on this one.

 

[Veer2Eternity]

I don't read or type fast enough to be on more than 1.

It's actually true that the forums are mostly littered with MGHSbots.

I don't even have to open the threads usually because they even use the same titles.

 

[Expect2Win]

It's actually true that the forums are mostly littered with MGHSbots.

I don't even have to open the threads usually because they even use the same titles.

So when he says he is doing his own research it is just from other forums?
I noticed he never defended the only 2 points of the original article he posted are speculation and exasperated off-hand comments.

 

[l_Pete_l]

You stirred them up this time MGHS.

 

[l_Pete_l]

If this were any media source's article on how Fox News has covered Hunter Biden they'd be ready to hand them a Pulitzer Prize.

 

[MGHS]

You literally post the same thing as the bot-trolls on about 5 other forums.

Daily.

Verbatim. Same links. Same sources.

CNN. Politico, Atlantic, Wash. Post/Times, Forbes, Guardian, The Hill, CBS, MSNBC,WSJ,Youtube... etc. I link all of them I freely admit that. Not sure how that is anything way out of the Norm. Pretty wide range of political spectrum on that list.

I guess if I'm posting on a topical subject of that day then yeah it would be posted on other Political forums as it's a Topical Subject that people are reading/watching. It's called current events in some circles, I'm not sure how you can make that into something Strange? But keep trying.

 

[MGHS]

It's actually true that the forums are mostly littered with MGHSbots.

I don't even have to open the threads usually because they even use the same titles.

What is a MGHSbot? All Major news outlet's have links and articles that pop up if you google a event/subject.

 

[Toots_mcgee]

 

[MGHS]

That's the response you got.... rather weak sauce deflection of the topic.

 

[Expect2Win]

That's the response you got.... rather weak sauce deflection of the topic.

So is your defense of an article that's evidence is an exasperated comment and ignoring facts that run counter to prevailing (Trump's) negative.

 

[MoSooner69]

Hold on.......you are telling me there are other forums out there besides mosport?

Don't believe it... there are no other sites.. its just liberal propaganda..

 

[MGHS]

So is your defense of an article that's evidence is an exasperated comment and ignoring facts that run counter to prevailing (Trump's) negative.

So far the evidence is weak and pure speculation at this point... One of Trumps minions met with a Russian is the extent of the evidence. Mueller found nothing but a obstruction case, now the NYT attack narrative has been blown full of holes.

At some point I'd actually like to see more than not even circumstantial evidence. I mean first it was Trump was a plant/operative because Russia had the Golden Shower Blackmail goods on him, then his campaign was in open collusion with Russia per the Fantasy Clinton Steel Dossier. Which was a Democratic Plant.

How does a Twitter Meme qualify as a article that runs counter to the CJR research article?

 

[Expect2Win]

So far the evidence is weak and pure speculation at this point... One of Trumps minions met with a Russian is the extent of the evidence. Mueller found nothing but a obstruction case, now the NYT attack narrative has been blown full of holes.

At some point I'd actually like to see more than not even circumstantial evidence. I mean first it was Trump was a plant/operative because Russia had the Golden Shower Blackmail goods on him, then his campaign was in open collusion with Russia per the Fantasy Clinton Steel Dossier. Which was a Democratic Plant.

How does a Twitter Meme qualify as a article that runs counter to the CJR research article?

What Twitter Meme? I read the article you linked.

 

[MGHS]

I was responding to Toots twitter meme as being a weak sauce response...

 

[bullitpdq68]

Don't believe it... there are no other sites.. its just liberal propaganda..

So Mosooner you almost ran me over with your big suitcase monday night.

 

[MoSooner69]

Was probably looking for one of those Monett Hot Dogs..LOL. Sorry about that.