I think we all want to stop illegal immigration. That’s nothing new or startling. It’s how to go about it. With the cutting of taxes (oh, yeah - Trump wanted another round of tax cuts just days before the midterms - remember that ploy?), how are we going to pay for a wall (oh, yeah - Trump said Mexico was going to pay for it - remember that ploy?), pay for infrastructure (oh, yeah - remember that ploy?), create a better healthcare plan than ACA (oh, yeah - remember that ploy?), and make us all tired of winning (oh, yeah - remember that ploy?). Promises made, promises kept (oh, yeah - remember that ploy?). One more ploy - remember this one - drain the swamp. Uh-huh.In 2009 Schumer wanted to stop illegal immigration and so did Obama.
Lie. They don't want to, its a political weapon against Trump, but just the latest in 50 years of same tactics.I think we all want to stop illegal immigration. That’s nothing new or startling. It’s how to go about it. With the cutting of taxes (oh, yeah - Trump wanted another round of tax cuts just days before the midterms - remember that ploy?), how are we going to pay for a wall (oh, yeah - Trump said Mexico was going to pay for it - remember that ploy?), pay for infrastructure (oh, yeah - remember that ploy?), create a better healthcare plan than ACA (oh, yeah - remember that ploy?), and make us all tired of winning (oh, yeah - remember that ploy?). Promises made, promises kept (oh, yeah - remember that ploy?). One more ploy - remember this one - drain the swamp. Uh-huh.
So you believe like Trump that Dems want complete open boarders? Now whose head is buried in ignorance?Lie. They don't want to, its a political weapon against Trump, but just the latest in 50 years of same tactics.
You really need to have the perspective of history. Pull your head out of ignorance.
So you believe like Trump that Dems want complete open borders? Now whose head is buried in ignorance?
I disagree. His cult followers believed it.A border without a wall is temporary an ineffective. Walls keep things in, and out.
The only reason they don't want the wall is because they work. They lie everytime they obfuscate and make excuses to not build a wall. There are multiple people on the right and left that don't want the wall. Its not exclusive. They're all liars.
Trump is a moron for thinking he can get it built.
Its the central issue why he was elected. Trump has a hard on for the wall. He's had two opportunities to do it before. He failed.
Nobody believed Mexico would pay for the wall. Its a non issue.
I beg to differ. There was a lot of people who believed the tough talk that Mexico would pay for the wall. Also, how can you say the wall is a non-issue? Just 24 hours ago the president said he’s willing and would be proud to shut down the government over its funding.A border without a wall is temporary an ineffective. Walls keep things in, and out.
The only reason they don't want the wall is because they work. They lie everytime they obfuscate and make excuses to not build a wall. There are multiple people on the right and left that don't want the wall. Its not exclusive. They're all liars.
Trump is a moron for thinking he can get it built.
Its the central issue why he was elected. Trump has a hard on for the wall. He's had two opportunities to do it before. He failed.
Nobody believed Mexico would pay for the wall. Its a non issue.
I don't know what other people think. I can't talk to all of them. I just know some might, some did, some didn't.I beg to differ. There was a lot of people who believed the tough talk that Mexico would pay for the wall. Also, how can you say the wall is a non-issue? Just 24 hours ago the president said he’s willing and would be proud to shut down the government over its funding.
That's not what I wrote. But, nice try.I beg to differ. There was a lot of people who believed the tough talk that Mexico would pay for the wall. Also, how can you say the wall is a non-issue? Just 24 hours ago the president said he’s willing and would be proud to shut down the government over its funding.
I apologize for my misinterpretation. Please explain what you wrote.That's not what I wrote. But, nice try.
I'm driving. Go away.I apologize for my misinterpretation. Please explain what you wrote.
Go to Isreal and test your theory. What's stopping you?Walls work
Until you go around it, dig under it or go over the top of it. But hey.... Maybe Mexico will pay for some cool wall art from hobby lobby to hang up.
I think we all want to stop illegal immigration. That’s nothing new or startling. It’s how to go about it.
A wall may reduce illegal immigration, but it has to be paid for.How can you say we all want to stop illegal immigration and allow or support sanctuary cities and states who refuse to follow federal laws on immigration and resist ICE?
How would you go about it?
Is 5 billion instead of 1.5 billion a big deal?
Do you think a wall wouldn't greatly reduce illegal immigration?
What's interesting is none of politician's that make the wall impossible, live among illegal aliens crossing the border. They are above the law of reality. Hence, more and more hypocrisy.A wall may reduce illegal immigration, but it has to be paid for.
I do think there is a huge, bigly difference between 1.5 B and 5 B. Feel free to make up the difference yourself if you feel it’s nothing.
Isn’t Nancy from California?What's interesting is none of politician's that make the wall impossible, live among illegal aliens crossing the border. They are above the law of reality. Hence, more and more hypocrisy.
She can live wherever she wants to live. Are you sure this isn't 3R?Isn’t Nancy from California?
I guess this isn't a lie either?Isn’t Nancy from California?
I'm still waiting for you lefties to run down to the border and pick up an illegal, move them in your house.I apologize for my misinterpretation. Please explain what you wrote.
In a budget over 4 thousand billion you think 3.5 billion is "bigly"? A bunch of the libs voted for 25B in border security not very long ago. What changed?A wall may reduce illegal immigration, but it has to be paid for.
I do think there is a huge, bigly difference between 1.5 B and 5 B. Feel free to make up the difference yourself if you feel it’s nothing.
Democrats basically vote Democrat because they think the Dems care so much for them...Hilarious.In a budget over 4 thousand billion you think 3.5 billion is "bigly"? A bunch of the libs voted for 25B in border security not very long ago. What changed?
I heard someone say the other day the wall is a 14th century cure for 21st century problem.A border without a wall is temporary and ineffective. Walls keep things in, and out.
The only reason they don't want the wall is that they work.
They lie every time they obfuscate and make excuses to not build a wall.
There are multiple people on the right and left that don't want the wall. It is not exclusive.
They're all liars.
Trump is a moron for thinking he can get it built.
It's the central issue why he was elected. Trump has hard-on for the wall. He's had two opportunities to do it before. He failed.
Not everyone believed Mexico would pay for the wall, its a non-issue.
And you believed it?I heard someone say the other day the wall is a 14th century cure for 21st century problem.![]()
I heard someone say the other day the wall is a 14th century cure for 21st century problem.![]()
We have a lot of great big fencing up already and we could add to that at a much smaller price then add more agents at the border and other surveillance. They gave Trump over a billion dollars and he hasn't been able to spend it in a year. They offered to give him more for next year but not 5 billion. He keeps claiming more wall is being built all the time when in reality it's fencing that as already there being repaired or replaced.And you believed it?
What is your solution to a problem you have said was a real problem?
Fences are there so we can pretend the Democrats care about Border Security.We have a lot of great big fencing up already and we could add to that at a much smaller price then add more agents at the border and other surveillance. They gave Trump over a billion dollars and he hasn't been able to spend it in a year. They offered to give him more for next year but not 5 billion. He keeps claiming more wall is being built all the time when in reality it's fencing that as already there being repaired or replaced.
We have a lot of great big fencing up already and we could add to that at a much smaller price then add more agents at the border and other surveillance. They gave Trump over a billion dollars and he hasn't been able to spend it in a year. They offered to give him more for next year but not 5 billion. He keeps claiming more wall is being built all the time when in reality it's fencing that as already there being repaired or replaced.
You can ram a wall with a train. A wall won't work. Pole Vaulting Hondurans can breach the wall. Small pregnant women and children destitute and starving can dig a tunnel with a claw hammer.OK, lets build a great big fence. Wait, that would be immoral wouldn't it or is it just if it's called a wall?
The last year has been spent building different prototypes. Since they came in under budget, they didn't need all the money. That used to be a good thing. Now that they are ready to proceed, it will cost more than prototypes. A good wall will require less manpower to guard which means.......less cost to operate.
178 million want to immigrate. A world with No Borders=abolish God=Gun Confiscation=Climate Change=Expand Supreme Court=Health Care for all=Gubmint take care of everything=no freedom=with massive strengthening of Gov=Free stuff to all=strings, strangle,death=Censorship=No inalienable rights=Wealth in hand of tyrants=Utopian Hell on earth. It can happen, it has happened.If the fence is a superior option, how do we have 30 million illegals here?
How many of those got immunity from conservative hero Ronald Reagan? I'm sure you already know that more folks here illegally came on a plane and over stayed their visa right than those who crossed the river or climbed a fence right?If the fence is a superior option, how do we have 30 million illegals here?
The illegals who got amnesty under Reagan AREN'T illegal anymore so none.How many of those got immunity from conservative hero Ronald Reagan? I'm sure you already know that more folks here illegally came on a plane and over stayed their visa right than those who crossed the river or climbed a fence right?
Good point. In these folks mind, relevant party history only applies if its beneficial to their justifications. The entire political history of the Democratic in the 20th Century is only relevant when it justifies their God-awful ideology.The illegals who got amnesty under Reagan AREN'T illegal anymore so none.
Wrong! Who told you this?
They people that are coming now wouldn't be either if they got amnesty, which I don't think they should get. I see you guys didn't address the part about how many came here in a away that has NOTHING to do with a wall . As far as fence versus a wall, the border patrol would rather have the big fence so they can see what's going on on the other side, not blinded by a big concrete wall.Good point. In these folks mind, relevant party history only applies if its beneficial to their justifications. The entire political history of the Democratic in the 20th Century is only relevant when it justifies their God-awful ideology.
Reagan mistakes are lasting and permanent setting the course for misery and disaster.
Woodrow Wilson, FDR, LBJ, Clinton, Obama are not President at this moment therefore History is irrelevant.
It's called willful ignorance, denial of the truth, failure to read and laziness.
I've been reminded of this over and over by majority posters on this board, even the ones who claim they know their content, and base their decisions for voting and claiming so-called informed decision making.
I see you guys didn't address the part about how many came here in a away that has NOTHING to do with a wall .
Ok since if know how many are here after having crossed the border illegally you probably also know how many have come here over the years and overstayed their visas. I've heard it from multiple sources of media from all sides of the spectrum. Even Fox News used to complain about how many are here with expired visas but that doesn't fit their narrative for the wall now so they don't mention it anymore. I couldn't begin to tell how many of either kind of folks are here and I'm pretty sure NO one can.I said it was false and asked who told you this. Far more people have crossed the border than came on a plane.
So you want our laws enforced?Ok since if know how many are here after having crossed the border illegally you probably also know how many have come here over the years and overstayed their visas. I've heard it from multiple sources of media from all sides of the spectrum. Even Fox News used to complain about how many are here with expired visas but that doesn't fit their narrative for the wall now so they don't mention it anymore. I couldn't begin to tell how many of either kind of folks are here and I'm pretty sure NO one can.