ADVERTISEMENT

Let me get my surprised look on

It sucks when the news story contradicts what you have been saying for months.

"The case does not undercut investigators’ findings that the Kremlin aided the Trump campaign — findings that were not based on the dossier. "
 
  • Haha
Reactions: Veer2Eternity
It sucks when the news story contradicts what you have been saying for months.

"The case does not undercut investigators’ findings that the Kremlin aided the Trump campaign — findings that were not based on the dossier. "

part of me hopes Trump runs again and gets elected just because of all this crap
There is currently indictments for the NRA folks that made illegal campaign contributions to Hawley and other GOP candidates to the tune of 7 million dollars and 25 million to the Trump campaign. There is also proof that there was a back channel set up for Trump campaign to communicate with the Russians. I have no idea why this keeps coming up as a reply to you expect. I have tried 3 times to make it to Cards rock.

 
Last edited:
You say proof...I have seen no receipts or proof. If they had back channel proof then it's pretty clear the Gov. minions would of acted on it. I mean they spend four years digging through every memo, email, text and document they could and Came up with Ziltch, Zero and NADA on Trump.

Just because the Left wing Media spews their speculation as fact doesn't make it so. Come on their source is some radial Anti-Gun Group .(Giffords)

Literally the FEC is ignoring the issue because they know it's BS and just a effort to smear the NRA and Politicians who support the 2nd amendment.

All they want is to defund NRA from making legal campaign donations. IT's pure politics by the Left.

Also this radical Group as filed this lawsuits against the NRA and accuses them of various breaches of campaign law which again the FEC has ignored, I have seen nowhere that a Federal Prosecutor has indictments against anyone. In fact they are Suing the NRA.......I hope you know the difference....between federal charges and another organization Suing a opposing organization...and they are asking for them to stop the current legal activity and to pay a fine/penalty.

If the FEC is ignoring it then it's pretty clear this is just a Smear tactic by this group. I mean the Federal Election Committee is scoffing at the Claims. So they had to file a Federal Law suit and SUE.
 
Last edited:
  • Haha
Reactions: Veer2Eternity
You say proof...I have seen no receipts or proof. If they had back channel proof then it's pretty clear the Gov. minions would of acted on it. I mean they spend four years digging through every memo, email, text and document they could and Came up with Ziltch, Zero and NADA on Trump.

Just because the Left wing Media spews their speculation as fact doesn't make it so. Come on their source is some radial Anti-Gun Group .(Giffords)

Literally the FEC is ignoring the issue because they know it's BS and just a effort to smear the NRA and Politicians who support the 2nd amendment.

All they want is to defund NRA from making legal campaign donations. IT's pure politics by the Left.

Also this radical Group as filed this lawsuits against the NRA and accuses them of various breaches of campaign law which again the FEC has ignored, I have seen nowhere that a Federal Prosecutor has indictments against anyone. In fact they are Suing the NRA.......I hope you know the difference....between federal charges and another organization Suing a opposing organization...and they are asking for them to stop the current legal activity and to pay a fine/penalty.

If the FEC is ignoring it then it's pretty clear this is just a Smear tactic by this group. I mean the Federal Election Committee is scoffing at the Claims. So they had to file a Federal Law suit and SUE.
The FEC is in a world of their own has been for a while. They won't investigate anything.
 
The FEC is in a world of their own has been for a while. They won't investigate anything.
Your statement is based on what evidence? You have to have that to investigate and you will need that evidence to be factual and not opinion based and that the law was broken.
 
Why do you need an investigation if you have the evidence?
To determine the validity of the evidence. ....it can entail information, belief and proposition......the investigation is necessary to prove it is actually factual and valid. Clearly the so-called evidence presented to the FEC is not valid or factual or they would follow up. It is just BS hear say and guess work. If it passed the smell test they would delve farther into the situation.

I get it the Dem's are so use to just throwing around False evidence and accusation(Collusion, Impeachment X2) and everyone falls in line with it being the truth it's a bit hard to swallow and digest when that doesn't happen.
 
To determine the validity of the evidence. ....it can entail information, belief and proposition......the investigation is necessary to prove it is actually factual and valid. Clearly the so-called evidence presented to the FEC is not valid or factual or they would follow up. It is just BS hear say and guess work. If it passed the smell test they would delve farther into the situation.

I get it the Dem's are so use to just throwing around False evidence and accusation(Collusion, Impeachment X2) and everyone falls in line with it being the truth it's a bit hard to swallow and digest when that doesn't happen.
Those were not false and you know it.
If a person does their due diligence and has all the information and takes it to them. None of these commissions want to work they will want everything handed to them, and it was they just don't want to do anything with it, mostly because they are as deadlocked as congress.
 
Those were not false and you know it.
If a person does their due diligence and has all the information and takes it to them. None of these commissions want to work they will want everything handed to them, and it was they just don't want to do anything with it, mostly because they are as deadlocked as congress.
come on why even try with him. He has to use a double handle to post on the poli board.
 
  • Haha
Reactions: tgrwds34
Those were not false and you know it.
If a person does their due diligence and has all the information and takes it to them. None of these commissions want to work they will want everything handed to them, and it was they just don't want to do anything with it, mostly because they are as deadlocked as congress.
BS clearly it's false and drummed up evidence. And you know that as well and now you want to blame the FEC for the fault of some fringe anti-2nd amendment organization.
 
come on why even try with him. He has to use a double handle to post on the poli board.
I have one handle....but I really don't care what you believe...at all. I pointed it out to you earlier it's not hard to look into that. I don't use a VPN. I find it interesting that this is your last ditch effort to try and some how throw shade at my posts.... Accusing me of using a double handle. LOL what would that accomplish? I've never understood the use of multiple handles and the benefit of having two names to post under?

....I joined this board in 2001. I never even started posting on the political board till the last year or so.....but continue on with your ever stranger post and even stranger mental behavior.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Arcola
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest posts

ADVERTISEMENT