Concluding he’s not guilty based on what can be proved, and actually not doing it are completely different things. Chiefs Homer’s have no shame it seems. He’s done it before (abuse), to this very women. Maybe he wouldn’t harm a kid? Which is good obviously. Where there’s fire, there’s smoke. As the saying goes. I don’t think it’s arguable he’s a bad dude.I'm sure the NFL and those who investigated the case would be happy to review the evidence you are using to convict him of what they concluded he was not guilty of...
If you get rid of all the bad dudes in the NFL there is going to be a lot of holes in everybody’s depth charts to fillConcluding he’s not guilty based on what can be proved, and actually not doing it are completely different things. Chiefs Homer’s have no shame it seems. He’s done it before (abuse), to this very women. Maybe he wouldn’t harm a kid? Which is good obviously. Where there’s fire, there’s smoke. As the saying goes. I don’t think it’s arguable he’s a bad dude.
If you get rid of all the bad dudes in the NFL there is going to be a lot of holes in everybody’s depth charts to fill
That's not how the saying goes. I'm concluding you are like a black hole (incredibly dense).
I don’t belong to any tribe that I know of. Lot of Cherokee and Quapaw around here though!!This is what I read. “I like Hill, he’s on my team. I’m a tribal person. So I’m going to make this a broad statement.” Let’s not focus on the player at hand..... Hill should have been suspended. That’s the point. The Chiefs gambled on character. (Again)
Apology accepted.Sorry? I guess? I’m guessing you are a perfectionist? Anyways, go back to defending a domestic abuser. As they say in Chiefs kingdom, it’s “talent over character” any day of the week. It’s proved by fans daily.
Concluding he’s not guilty based on what can be proved, and actually not doing it are completely different things. Chiefs Homer’s have no shame it seems. He’s done it before (abuse), to this very women. Maybe he wouldn’t harm a kid? Which is good obviously. Where there’s fire, there’s smoke. As the saying goes. I don’t think it’s arguable he’s a bad dude.
What proof do you have that he is a bad dude?Concluding he’s not guilty based on what can be proved, and actually not doing it are completely different things. Chiefs Homer’s have no shame it seems. He’s done it before (abuse), to this very women. Maybe he wouldn’t harm a kid? Which is good obviously. Where there’s fire, there’s smoke. As the saying goes. I don’t think it’s arguable he’s a bad dude.
We need to be talking about those awesome Saint L............I mean LOS ANGELES Rams!What proof do you have that he is a bad dude?
We need to be talking about those awesome Saint L............I mean LOS ANGELES Rams!
Haha I would assume he knows better..............TopHat I just noticed your imagine, I am surprised Duck hasn't called you a racist for displaying, or did I miss that conversation.
I actually want to be waaaaay less political here this year. Just my little statement about that whole stupid deal, though. Meanwhile back to football.................Haha I would assume he knows better..............
He HAS hit his now ex girlfriend. Charged and accused of it multiple times in college. Id say no good guy does that. Do chiefs fans not read, or study up on anything? Or is the whole NFL world against you? Ive heard that before.What proof do you have that he is a bad dude?
Read/study: 1. 2. According to 810 sports radio, Tyreek Hill did not break his son’s arm. This report says that the broken arm was an accident and not an intentional injury due to either Hill or his fiance Cyrstal Espinal. (somewhere, later, I read, "investigators have proven T Hill did not break his son's arm. (Hill and baby mama both admit to spanking their child with their hand and or with a belt. Investigators could not determine which one went too far". (have you read the article where they have hundreds of text evidence that bab mama and her father have attempted extorting money from T Hill?He HAS hit his now ex girlfriend. Charged and accused of it multiple times in college. Id say no good guy does that. Do chiefs fans not read, or study up on anything? Or is the whole NFL world against you? Ive heard that before.
Read/study: 1. 2. According to 810 sports radio, Tyreek Hill did not break his son’s arm. This report says that the broken arm was an accident and not an intentional injury due to either Hill or his fiance Cyrstal Espinal. (somewhere, later, I read, "investigators have proven T Hill did not break his son's arm. (Hill and baby mama both admit to spanking their child with their hand and or with a belt. Investigators could not determine which one went too far". (have you read the article where they have hundreds of text evidence that bab mama and her father have attempted extorting money from T Hill?
He took a plea deal. NOT the same as actually being guilty. Look, if he fought it and lost he goes to prison and misses an NFL career. if he takes it he goes to the NFL. Right/wrong/indifferent, that is a no-brainer. He has not been found guilty in any other manner. Obviously, you are entitled to your opinion but no matter what you say or think, at this time he is innocent.There's so much you refuse to see. First off no good man gets accused 3 times or more of abuse on a child. Or on hitting a women. Next, he pleaded guilty to hitting his now ex girlfriend. But I'm sure you have a excuse on deck for that too huh? Not to mention how moronic is it to STAY with someone if it was all fake?!? (its not). Keep being tribal buddy! Its a great look! You sound like Alex Jones right now. So does anyone who defends him.