ADVERTISEMENT

Just another day at the office

But guns aren’t a problem. Like my wife always says, “no brains, no headaches”.

We need to put in steel doors at the church parking lot and the cemetery. Then hire an army to patrol the hospital floors. Seems like there could be alternatives.
 
But guns aren’t a problem. Like my wife always says, “no brains, no headaches”.

We need to put in steel doors at the church parking lot and the cemetery. Then hire an army to patrol the hospital floors. Seems like there could be alternatives.
There is,,,,everyone carry and return fire this crap

from a week ago

Dennis Butler, 37, was killed Wednesday night after he pulled out the rifle and began shooting at dozens of people attending the birthday-graduation party outside an apartment complex in Charleston, police said in a statement.

The woman, who was attending the party, drew a pistol and fired, killing Butler, the statement said. No one at the party was injured.
 
There is,,,,everyone carry and return fire this crap

from a week ago

Dennis Butler, 37, was killed Wednesday night after he pulled out the rifle and began shooting at dozens of people attending the birthday-graduation party outside an apartment complex in Charleston, police said in a statement.

The woman, who was attending the party, drew a pistol and fired, killing Butler, the statement said. No one at the party was injured.
And a unicorn sprinkled everyone with fairy dust and they lived happily ever after.
 
So you spend all your free time scouring crime reports in a country of 340 million and found some guns involved. Oh.

You support racist "prosecutors" who refuse to put people of certain demographics in jail for pretty much anything including gun crimes. Maybe we should start there. I don't think you're going to get regular law abiding citizens to give up their guns. Shame them more though, for things they have no responsibility for, that might convince them.
It seems to me that gun violence might be on an uptick but media coverage of gun violence is at an all time high.
 
If we are going to return to the Wild West, even Wyatt Earp made all the cowpokes turn in their guns when entering Tombstone.
 
Yes to both. It is up, but the media is hysterically reporting every single instance right now cause they think they smell blood in the water (politically speaking).

Why it is up, and why 90% of the media parrots each other's talking points and conducts daily propaganda assaults on behalf of the left, is not a discussion our resident lefties want to have. They also (in true racist fashion) were ok with gun violence when it was confined to the inner city.

I agree 100%. The sensationalized media coverage of these shootings is nonstop for a week or so, and that just puts ideas in the heads of mentally unstable people. The media is all about ratings. Ratings equals dollars. Fox is just as guilty of playing the ratings game. They just avoid the nonstop "all in" coverage of gun violence incidents because it goes against their viewership's right pro gun ownership political stance. But you can bet Fox will have nonstop "all in" coverage every time Trump wipes his ass and their viewership will be hanging by every dingleberry!!
 
  • Like
Reactions: HomeyR
If guns don’t kill people, why do we give people guns when they go to war? Why not just send the people?

Ozzy Osbourne

Even that burnout sees thru the nonsense.
 
You assume the unprovable truth that greatest good for many can be accomplished by removing guns from American society. You also seem to assume the greatest good can be accomplished for Americans with your ideas about healthcare and on down the line according to what I have read here.
WOW such an astute analysis from a new member of 3 weeks!!! 🤣 🤣 🤣 🤣 🤣
 
  • Haha
Reactions: Toots_mcgee
The “greatest good” to a conservative is whatever enriches “the man” and keeps the po folk in their place.
 
Yes to both. It is up, but the media is hysterically reporting every single instance right now cause they think they smell blood in the water (politically speaking).

Why it is up, and why 90% of the media parrots each other's talking points and conducts daily propaganda assaults on behalf of the left, is not a discussion our resident lefties want to have. They also (in true racist fashion) were ok with gun violence when it was confined to the inner city.
All media does this. You should check out the rightwing whackjob sources (I'm sure some of you do).

They basically run as many minority shooting stories as they can find when things like this happen.

I don't know the answer to this problem but it is a problem.
I'm sure the shooter wasn't in a well regulated militia. Otherwise said militia would be sued.
 
And a unicorn sprinkled everyone with fairy dust and they lived happily ever after.
Not true OBAMA commissioned CDC study found that weapons are used millions of times a year in defensive efforts.
 
If guns don’t kill people, why do we give people guns when they go to war? Why not just send the people?

Ozzy Osbourne

Even that burnout sees thru the nonsense.
People die from guns but not that many in the Grand scheme of deaths in America. The odds from dying from a gun is rather low as well. Gun deaths are statistical zero of a worry.

The gun is a tool, in the hands of a criminal it can kill, in the hands of a non-criminal it protects and saves lives.

You only focus on the negative and not the positive benefits of owning Guns.

And your misguided or naive belief that more laws and more regulations will hinder or even slow down the Mentally unbalanced or criminals from getting weapons is gullible.

Concerning Ozzy statement more people are killed by hands and fist than by AR15 so just sending people is a effective method of killing people. Through out the history of warfare hand to hand combat happens frequently that is why the female gender often fairs poorly in those situations when facing men.
 
All media does this. You should check out the rightwing whackjob sources (I'm sure some of you do).

They basically run as many minority shooting stories as they can find when things like this happen.

I don't know the answer to this problem but it is a problem.
I'm sure the shooter wasn't in a well regulated militia. Otherwise said militia would be sued.
You don't have to be in a Civil Militia outside of Govt control to bear arms, the 2A points this out and the SC backed it up.
I guessed you missed the memo that the rural poor are all Repubs now. No actually you didn't, you just like to play both sides of an issue.
Sometimes toots says all REP are uneducated rural folks other times they are Fat KAT Rich folks who oppress everyone else.
 
  • Like
Reactions: invicto
I guessed you missed the memo that the rural poor are all Repubs now. No actually you didn't, you just like to play both sides of an issue.
A lot of the rural poor are not well educated and vote against their own best interests. Did you not hear Trump’s words? “I love the uneducated”. Do you think he really loves them? When a man tells me what a POS he is, I believe him. He said Republicans are “the dumbest voters”. And you proved it.
 
Did you say "Another day at the Office"
z1lvls5433k81.jpg
 
  • Like
Reactions: Grankid
But secretly, from their underground bunkers filled with assault rifles, industrial size cans of vegetables, and Confederate flags on the walls, these uneducated idiots use their vast wealth and tech dominance to control and oppress the masses.

I could have just called you a fool but I liked that better.
 
People die from guns but not that many in the Grand scheme of deaths in America. The odds from dying from a gun is rather low as well. Gun deaths are statistical zero of a worry.

The gun is a tool, in the hands of a criminal it can kill, in the hands of a non-criminal it protects and saves lives.

You only focus on the negative and not the positive benefits of owning Guns.

And your misguided or naive belief that more laws and more regulations will hinder or even slow down the Mentally unbalanced or criminals from getting weapons is gullible.

Concerning Ozzy statement more people are killed by hands and fist than by AR15 so just sending people is a effective method of killing people. Through out the history of warfare hand to hand combat happens frequently that is why the female gender often fairs poorly in those situations when facing men.
In what war in the last 50 years has hand to and combat happened frequently?
 
Try to stay on task....again I never mentioned a time Frame. Your attempt to put a Arbitrary time stamp of 50 years on my point even though...I specifically stated THROUHG OUT HISTORY clearly shows your minimal reading comprehension skills and has exposed your lack of ability to engage in a intellectual discussion.
 
Try to stay on task....again I never mentioned a time Frame. Your attempt to put a Arbitrary time stamp of 50 years on my point even though...I specifically stated THROUHG OUT HISTORY clearly shows your minimal reading comprehension skills and has exposed your lack of ability to engage in a intellectual discussion.
 
You said it "happens freqeuntly" not that it happened in WW2. We've been in several wars in the last 50 years and I'd bet hand to hand combat has been pretty rare Mr. intellectual!.
 
I said it happened Frequently through out history.....Why are you now bringing up WW2? I never mentioned WW2 or any war specifically in the Last 50 years outside the context of the total of the history of warfare.

Again you can't seem to grasp my point at all. I said Hand to Hand combat in the Total History of Warfare has ended up in hand to hand combat frequently. That is a bonafide fact.

You want to move the goal post to fit your narrative that in the last 50 years it has not been as frequent, I guess you have some immature need to do this so some how you can save face after you looked foolish in not understand a pretty simple and straight forward statement.

You seem to confuse and not understand a lot when people are making points. Cleary I now expect that from your responses to peoples post. If this is brought to your attention Then you double down with a irrational emotional need to try and prove what ever confused point you gleaned from various posts, with other confusing statements. Then of course you go all elementary school with some Backhanded comment like Mr. Intellectual....Which is very amusing to say the least.

Again I will point out that my point and topic has nothing to do with Hand To hand Combat in JUST the last 50 years and whether it is more or less frequent in that 50 years or During WW2! That is a totally different point than what I was referencing.

Keep trying to make it about the last 50 years all you want it just 100% proves you can't even grasp a simple concept written in plain English.

Of course it would be easy enough for you to start a thread on the Frequency of Hand to Hand combat in the last 50 yrs if that is a topic that is near and dear to your heart...just type it in the new thread section and write down your opinions and idea's.
 
Last edited:
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest posts

ADVERTISEMENT