ADVERTISEMENT

Is stealing signals cheating or good coaching?

Not cheating if you can pick it up from game film, but no sending scouts to games with cameras focused on the sideline 🚫
Exactly. Every coach in the state looks to see if they can see it on the film they receive. Literally everyone
 
What exactly would be unethical about it without just making up a set of ethics out of thin air?
 
Is "STEALING" signs cheating or good coaching?

Stealing implies theft. Maybe you should have said "interpreting" signs.😉

If they yelled out their play calls, are you supposed to pretend not to hear it? Would it be unethical to change your defensive call to one that is more advantageous if they scream out “29 Buck?” Likewise, if they broadcast their play calls for all to see, should you pretend you don’t see it?
 
  • Like
Reactions: Treadmill
Signaling your plays in is a big advantage for the offense. They can speed up the tempo, so I don't have a problem with the defense trying to get the advantage back, or get better at Signaling
 
….”good sportsmanship, professionalism, and conduct”….
Up to the member school to ensure all associated with the activity conduct themselves…
So if a person videos a team for the sole purpose of interpreting their signs ….??? Up to the school to decide (
 
I know a guy who did that.
You can also run the play in if you don't want your signals interpreted
You mean like after a play is ran, the QB goes towards the sideline, the coach tells him the next play, and he then tells the rest of the huddle? What about you have an extra WR who runs in the next play call, and at the same time a WR on the field comes off. In the old days they called that "the superintendent's son's position". Darn the luck when they actually passed the ball it was his turn to be on the sideline.
 
  • Haha
Reactions: Treadmill
Maybe have your players remember numbers that correspond with the play. I mean if you can't come up with a way to fool the other team you deserve to have it stolen. I even kept old numbers from previous game but changed the play from a team played earlier. Caught them several times thinking they knew our play.
 
You mean like after a play is ran, the QB goes towards the sideline, the coach tells him the next play, and he then tells the rest of the huddle? What about you have an extra WR who runs in the next play call, and at the same time a WR on the field comes off. In the old days they called that "the superintendent's son's position". Darn the luck when they actually passed the ball it was his turn to be on the sideline.
Both works, just can't run hurry up o fence
 
Okay Taco Bell, the question you’ve been waiting for.
Why this thread in the first place?
Just curious on everyone's opinion, seems like it's 50/50. Some have strong opinions one way or the other, no hidden agenda believe it or not
 
  • Like
Reactions: Arcola
You mean like after a play is ran, the QB goes towards the sideline, the coach tells him the next play, and he then tells the rest of the huddle? What about you have an extra WR who runs in the next play call, and at the same time a WR on the field comes off. In the old days they called that "the superintendent's son's position". Darn the luck when they actually passed the ball it was his turn to be on the sideline.
Run it in with the WR. Makes you keep your play calls from sounding like Gruden.
 
  • Haha
Reactions: Taco Tico
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest posts

ADVERTISEMENT