1000 1500 so on Who makes their team better. I have watched scorers hurt their team
I was able to see the Clevenger girl from Clever a few times. She makes that team better and the other girls seem to feed off her. Worth watching play.1000 1500 so on Who makes their team better. I have watched scorers hurt their team
I see she reached 1500 yesterday.I was able to see the Clevenger girl from Clever a few times. She makes that team better and the other girls seem to feed off her. Worth watching play.
It's not a 4 point line, I don't think that math works too well.3 pt line makes 1000 = 2000
I wouldn’t go that far. Stats can be very deceiving. Their are kids out there who can be very successful and score a lot of points but their team around them is not very good. That doesn’t mean they are hurting their team. Stats are just a snapshot of the game. Some kids might just face better defensive teams day in and day out that lower their percentages. I wouldn’t take anything away from any of those kids.There ARE scorers that hurt their teams. What I have found is that the ones who score the most points per field goal attempts are the best and most efficient scorers and that translates into greatly helping their team and generally equates to wins
For example, this season Clevenger is scoring 1.6 points per field goal attempt which is outstanding at the high school level. She takes around 15 field goal attempts to score her 25-26 per game. Gets to the line around 7 times per and hits the 3 ball at a 35-40% clip and according to Max Preps she's 65% on 2 point shots. That's the epitome of an efficient scorer.
But there are plenty of 1000-1500 point scorers who don't come close to those ratios. A kid who averages 17 ppg but shoots 18 field goal attempts per game really isn't helping their team win, especially if they are also turnover prone, but it'll give them a shot at the 1000, even 1500 point milestone.
And unfortunately, to the OP's point, scoring average and point milestones aren't everything and rings hollow when a player's team isn't very successful.
I wouldn’t go that far. Stats can be very deceiving. Their are kids out there who can be very successful and score a lot of points but their team around them is not very good. That doesn’t mean they are hurting their team. Stats are just a snapshot of the game. Some kids might just face better defensive teams day in and day out that lower their percentages. I wouldn’t take anything away from any of those kids.
There ARE scorers that hurt their teams. What I have found is that the ones who score the most points per field goal attempts are the best and most efficient scorers and that translates into greatly helping their team and generally equates to wins.
For example, this season Clevenger is scoring 1.6 points per field goal attempt which is outstanding at the high school level. She takes around 15 field goal attempts to score her 25-26 per game. Gets to the line around 7 times per and hits the 3 ball at a 35-40% clip and according to Max Preps she's 65% on 2 point shots. That's the epitome of an efficient scorer.
But there are plenty of 1000-1500 point scorers who don't come close to those ratios. A kid who averages 17 ppg but shoots 18 field goal attempts per game really isn't helping their team win, especially if they are also turnover prone, but it'll give them a shot at the 1000, even 1500 point milestone.
And unfortunately, to the OP's point, scoring average and point milestones aren't everything and rings hollow when a player's team isn't very successful.
It seems a good majority of the kids both girls and boys who score a lot points come from smaller schools. Not to take away their accomplishments, but they don’t see the defense bigger schools see night in and night out.