Trump has had better nights. Thought he walked right into Fiorina's trap with the women comments, you could tell she was just waiting for that.
When do you guys think this race starts to narrow and candidates start to drop? Because Rand Paul had a look on his face at the end of the night like he knew he had no shot. Maybe that's just his permanent look, afterall the Donald did basically call him ugly on national tv. Lol.
Don't forget that there were four candidates who participated in a pre-debate!Trump has had better nights. Thought he walked right into Fiorina's trap with the women comments, you could tell she was just waiting for that.
When do you guys think this race starts to narrow and candidates start to drop? Because Rand Paul had a look on his face at the end of the night like he knew he had no shot. Maybe that's just his permanent look, afterall the Donald did basically call him ugly on national tv. Lol.
Don't forget that there were four candidates who participated in a pre-debate!
When do you guys think this race starts to narrow and candidates start to drop?
One has dropped and CNN dropped another. It's probably too early to thin much but a lot of them seemed desperate last night. Christie, Walker, Rubio, and Kasich seemed to be really pressing to get noticed while Cruz, Carson, and Paul almost seemed happy to stay out of the fray.
All the lower tier guys in the polls are trying to outlast some of the herd. It's hard to get noticed with everyone focused on Donald. I thought CNN went out of their way to make the debate Bush vs Trump.
"FOX used the forum to find out what real issues were out there.". Bahaha
Fox played gotcha Donald Trump.
It was all about ratings and The Donald.
I thought fox asked more questions of substance. CNN asked a lot more questions like "candidate X said ABC about you, candidate Y - respond to that." Those questions provide for fireworks and great theater, but they aren't as good as a straight question at getting politicians to speak on the record"FOX used the forum to find out what real issues were out there.". Bahaha
Fox played gotcha Donald Trump.
It was all about ratings and The Donald.
You didn't listen to Rand then.The only thing I heard loud and clear was War War War and that is very scary. This was the one thing they were certain of. The rest of the stuff was very generic. Oh and I forgot Carly and her animated lie about parent plan hood to which nobody could verify. I think she should be made to show that video she claims to exist. It has to be out there some where.
Trump had real good point when said Rand Paul shouldn't even be on the stage. Why have #11 on that stage when the other debate only had 6. His numbers are no better than theirs. They could have split pretty evenly and got more done.Donald Trump said something to the effect of "let ISIS and Assad fight it out." That was the second least pro-war thing I heard. Someone might want to tell him that Assad hasn't been that interested in fighting ISIS to date, but that's a different discussion.
The establishment type Rs (Bush, Fiorina, Rubio, etc.) were locked in a battle of rhetoric to see who could sound the most pro-death.
Trump had real good point when said Rand Paul shouldn't even be on the stage. Why have #11 on that stage when the other debate only had 6. His numbers are no better than theirs. They could have split pretty evenly and got more done.
I thought of that after my post but just got back on here. BTW I don't "live" to do ANYTHING with your posts. The fact that only 4 were in the first debate makes it even more ridiculous that Paul was added to the second debate which already had 10.Since you seem to live to correct my posts, there were only four in the first debate.
Trump looked small making the comment about Rand his first comment totally out of context.
There should have been fewer candidates in the "main event" and more in the "jv" event.
The only thing I heard loud and clear was War War War and that is very scary. This was the one thing they were certain of. The rest of the stuff was very generic. Oh and I forgot Carly and her animated lie about parent plan hood to which nobody could verify. I think she should be made to show that video she claims to exist. It has to be out there some where.
The video Fiorina is so disgusted about has NOT been seen by the people in congress that are fighting to defund Planned Parenthood and they have seen some that have not been released to the public, so I'll have to assume it doesn't exist.You live in a filtered news world where your liberal media plays you as the fool.
Ever wonder why they preach to you that FOX NEWS is a lie?
Why are your friends on this site not responding?
They too see you as easy to manipulate.
Googling live video from Planned Parenthood is as easy as ordering online the biography of Bobby Fischer.
I would like to say it's just because of your age that you don't understand the technology but I'm 58, no excuses.
You are either a very naïve liberal Democrat that follows wherever your party leads, or a condoner of the atrocities of Plan Parenthood .
If you care...
You will challenge your fellow Democrats to place the links themselves, then explain why it's ok to harvest baby parts from so called "unborn children".
The video Fiorina is so disgusted about has NOT been seen by the people in congress that are fighting to defund Planned Parenthood and they have seen some that have not been released to the public, so I'll have to assume it doesn't exist.
I have no idea what that has to do with whether or not Carly Fiorina told the world about a video that doesn't really exist that she says shows people from Planned Parenthood talking about selling the brain of an aborted fetus. Mean while I still assume IF it does the folks in congress that are investigating this issue would have seen it. They have NOT.I'll just assume them that your a born again Democrat that supports late term abortion's...
There, now were even...
The candidates worked pretty hard to redirect to foreign policy as well. No doubt CNN focused on it to an absurd degree though.When all the questions are on foreign policy and the conditions around the world, you aren't gonna hear about anything else. CNN had a goal of not giving questions of substance. They wanted a food fight that made people look hostile about everything.
The planned parenthood stuff is a dog and pony show for the base. Nothing more.I have no idea what that has to do with whether or not Carly Fiorina told the world about a video that doesn't really exist that she says shows people from Planned Parenthood talking about selling the brain of an aborted fetus. Mean while I still assume IF it does the folks in congress that are investigating this issue would have seen it. They have NOT.
Walker was terrible.I only saw the last 50 minutes. Rand Paul was sensible and gave logical reasons for his positions. Christie seemed more relaxed. Cruz and Walker need to drop out. Didn't see Kasich say much.
There's a good argument to be made that they shouldn't be cutting legit candidates down into a first debate. Jindal is a sitting governor. Graham a senator. Santorum won millions of votes four years ago. Why are they not in a real debate so their voice can be heard and considered? No one has voted yet.I thought of that after my post but just got back on here. BTW I don't "live" to do ANYTHING with your posts. The fact that only 4 were in the first debate makes it even more ridiculous that Paul was added to the second debate which already had 10.
Any representative that refuses to vote for the CR in the next two weeks because it won't defund planned parenthood should be thrown out of office.
A) It won't get that far.Any President that won't sign a bill because it defunds Planned Parenthood should be thrown out of office,
HUH? What MOST people are thinking? I think that is about 10% at most.I thought it was a great debate. I just love how Trump has turned this thing upside down and says what most people are thinking anyway.
That being said, he is a total goofball, and if he gets elected we will be at war all over America as well as the world.
I have two questions for you. How come it is OK for the guy 2nd in the Republican polls to have performed research on aborted fetuses? Why is it OK for many Republican's to vote for someone who did this, when they are so against these abortions?You live in a filtered news world where your liberal media plays you as the fool.
Ever wonder why they preach to you that FOX NEWS is a lie?
Why are your friends on this site not responding?
They too see you as easy to manipulate.
Googling live video from Planned Parenthood is as easy as ordering online the biography of Bobby Fischer.
I would like to say it's just because of your age that you don't understand the technology but I'm 58, no excuses.
You are either a very naïve liberal Democrat that follows wherever your party leads, or a condoner of the atrocities of Plan Parenthood .
If you care...
You will challenge your fellow Democrats to place the links themselves, then explain why it's ok to harvest baby parts from so called "unborn children".
It's way more than 10 percent of the R base.HUH? What MOST people are thinking? I think that is about 10% at most.
I have two questions for you. How come it is OK for the guy 2nd in the Republican polls to have performed research on aborted fetuses? Why is it OK for many Republican's to vote for someone who did this, when they are so against these abortions?