Hillary Clinton
- Thread starter Drop.Tine
- Start date
S
Stevedangos
Guest
cant use IHATEMONICA@HOTMAIL.COM when you are Secretary of State for your official email 
This post was edited on 3/3 8:09 AM by Stevedangos
This is going to leave a mark
This post was edited on 3/3 8:09 AM by Stevedangos
This is going to leave a mark
Nothing short of Murder will keep me from Voting for her.
Wait a second, The Republicans have already tried to accuse Bill and HER of that with the
Ron Brown Airline Crash death and the Vince Foster suicide. So that makes it official..........
EVEN MURDER ACCUSATIONS WONT KEEP ME FROM VOTING FOR HER.
Wait a second, The Republicans have already tried to accuse Bill and HER of that with the
Ron Brown Airline Crash death and the Vince Foster suicide. So that makes it official..........
EVEN MURDER ACCUSATIONS WONT KEEP ME FROM VOTING FOR HER.
No shock there.Originally posted by docfever_2:
Nothing short of Murder will keep me from Voting for her.
Wait a second, The Republicans have already tried to accuse Bill and HER of that with the
Ron Brown Airline Crash death and the Vince Foster suicide. So that makes it official..........
EVEN MURDER ACCUSATIONS WONT KEEP ME FROM VOTING FOR HER.
What was she thinking?
First the bad 2008 campaign, now this...she needs some better staffers and advisors.
I have no clue how the White House lawyers let her do this.
This post was edited on 3/3 10:26 AM by Neutron Monster
First the bad 2008 campaign, now this...she needs some better staffers and advisors.
I have no clue how the White House lawyers let her do this.
This post was edited on 3/3 10:26 AM by Neutron Monster
I think Clinton has enough distance from Obama that she'll be ok on that unless his # really tank.
I don't think she's a perfect candidate for the Ds but I don't know who is better than her right now.
i'm not sure she cares what anyone else thinks. She pretty much does as she wants on nearly everything.
S
Stevedangos
Guest
If you've ever used a government email you will totally understand why she did this.
Posted from Rivals Mobile
Posted from Rivals Mobile
S
Stevedangos
Guest
She did it so there would be no records for anyone to subpena or obtain under a Freedom of Information Act request.
"In an effort to comply with federal record-keeping laws, aides to the former secretary of state turned over 55,000 emails to the State Department two months ago, according to the Times report."
Yeah, clearly hiding stuff.
Posted from Rivals Mobile
Yeah, clearly hiding stuff.
Posted from Rivals Mobile
I don't think that's remotely close to being true based on everything I've read about her. If anything, she relies too much on her team.
Eagles making an appearance on the PC Board. Must be boring on the BB board. It ain't as busy as it used to be this time of the year, is it?
Not at all. I miss guys like HEEB and Keeper. And those that had opinions. And I'm about out of Hudl stuff to watch. And the Cats are 29-0, so nobody wants to faaarrrr Cal. That makes CatsPause boring. Figured I'd come over here and educate myself on something I know nothing about.
This post was edited on 3/3 1:41 PM by Eagles_Ball
S
Stevedangos
Guest
She sent them to the same place Rove and the others in the Shrub WH sent theirs...MILLIONS of them gone. I don't recall republiberalcans making nary a peep about that. When you wonder why I think the GOP is full of hypocrites..here's an easy example.
S
Stevedangos
Guest
I didnt know ex Governers were bound by Federal Law to keep all emails as public record like Hillary was?
Especially since she actually sent the terrorists the floor plan for Benghazi. She wanted to get rid of them.
I don't at all see bush as a shoe in but there is really no serious alternative to Hillary at the moment. There's no obama or Edwards out there.
Could have been walker but he put his state in the tank economically. His rhetoric doesn't match reality.
Pubs also are different in how their primaries work. Much more explicit in having certain wings which have favored candidates - the evangelical wing, the libertarian wing, the business wing, and the Tea Party wing come to mind. And, the early primary states have different mixes of those groups, so it's not that easy for someone to win all of Iowa, NH, NV, SC, etc. Hard to be an inevitable candidate in that environment.
Dems have their own groups (union, minorities, women, uber liberals, etc.) but their primary voters haven't developed into such explicit voting blocks.
