Folks out here killing dem politicians
- Thread starter BlackHawkPride
- Start date
I hope they catch him soon.
He spent a lot of money to pull this off. Adding lights to a vehicle to make it look like a police car and dressing like one.
His manifesto is going to be insane.
He spent a lot of money to pull this off. Adding lights to a vehicle to make it look like a police car and dressing like one.
His manifesto is going to be insane.
Yep it's kinda like the former trump supporter that took a shot at mango.
What happened to them to bring them to this?
Regarding Vance Boelter:
He is director at "Praetorian Guard Security Services" and has been involved in "security situations" in Africa, West Bank, and Gaza. He apparently served on the MN non-partisan Governor s Workforce Development Board as a business representative from 2016 to January 2023.
Boelter is an NAR Christian Nationalist who ran mercenary groups Red Lion and Security Patriots.
The New Apostolic Reformation (NAR) is a Christian supremacist theological belief and controversial movement associated with the far-right that combines elements of Pentecostalism, evangelicalism, and the Seven Mountain Mandate to advocate for spiritual warfare to bring about Christian dominion over all aspects of society, and end or weaken the separation of church and state. NAR leaders often call themselves apostles and prophets.
He is director at "Praetorian Guard Security Services" and has been involved in "security situations" in Africa, West Bank, and Gaza. He apparently served on the MN non-partisan Governor s Workforce Development Board as a business representative from 2016 to January 2023.
Boelter is an NAR Christian Nationalist who ran mercenary groups Red Lion and Security Patriots.
The New Apostolic Reformation (NAR) is a Christian supremacist theological belief and controversial movement associated with the far-right that combines elements of Pentecostalism, evangelicalism, and the Seven Mountain Mandate to advocate for spiritual warfare to bring about Christian dominion over all aspects of society, and end or weaken the separation of church and state. NAR leaders often call themselves apostles and prophets.
Boelter had been appointed to a Minnesota state advisory committee by the previous democratic governor and reappointed by Waltz,,,,,,so I doubt he was a hard core republican???
You're wrong. Stop slobbing on that MAGA media you derp.
Do some research instead of letting fauxnews feed you your every thought.
Well all I know is this is what PBS is reporting
Democratic Gov. Mark Dayton, who served from 2011 to 2019, appointed Boelter as a "private sector representative" on the Governor's Workforce Development Board.
On Dec. 9, 2019, Walz reappointed Boelter to serve on the group as a "business member." The board — which has about 60 members, 41 of whom are appointed by the governor — analyzes and recommends to the governor and state Legislature workforce policies related to things such as talent development or addressing barriers to employment — to help Minnesota maintain a globally competitive labor force, its website says.
The board includes members from the public sector, the private sector, organized labor and community-based organizations, the website said.
Well educate yourself for a change instead of picking out the news that fits your narrative.
This is another typical attempt to spread confusion and distract from the truth. It didn’t work. Everyone knows he is a failed businessman who was a Trump diehard and a wannabe cop who had a long list of left leaning potential victims written down in his car along with AK-47s and other weapons.
He riddled the first couple with 17 bullets. He shot the speakers husband in front of the cops. And what does Blinded want to talk about? Him being appointed to some insignificant bi-partisan board years ago. Blinded is a despicable person.
He riddled the first couple with 17 bullets. He shot the speakers husband in front of the cops. And what does Blinded want to talk about? Him being appointed to some insignificant bi-partisan board years ago. Blinded is a despicable person.
Well is PBS right or wrong????
They are supposed to be a non partisan news organization
I could honestly care less about the guy. If it’s proved beyond a reasonable doubt he killed those folks he should be hung by the neck until dead (and upon conviction not after 20 years on death row)
A man has to answer for the wicked he’s done,take all the rope in Texas find a tall oak tree hang them high in the street for all the people to see
Toby and Willie knew how to handle the bad boys
Tell us about the rest of this dude's life.
Hint: He's a right wing nutjob and he was appointed to a 'bi-partisan' seat.
Funny how you derps wanna blame the dems for what one of your own has done.
Never accept blame. That's the MAGA way..
Here let me help your lazy self out:
"
However, a man named David Carlson, who identified himself as Boelter’s current roommate, told the Minnesota-based television channel KARE-TV that Boelter voted for Trump in the 2024 election. Carlson said Boelter had not discussed politics recently.
The Minnesota Star Tribune newspaper reported that the police found a list purportedly written by Boelter containing the names of “prominent pro-choice individuals in Minnesota, including many Democratic lawmakers”. The Tribune also quoted Carlson saying that Boelter “really hated abortion” through the 1990s.
The AP reported that Carlson also read texts to reporters that Boelter had sent to friends: “I’m going to be gone for a while. May be dead shortly, so I just want to let you know I love you guys both and I wish it hadn’t gone this way. … I’m sorry for all the trouble this has caused.”"
Phew.
Who the hell gives a damn ??? Thousands of people are out on the streets throwing rocks and bricks and bottles of gasoline at law enforcement and you guys could care less. Throw all of their asses in jail for 20 years where they belong .
There are 50 homicides a day in the United States, why aren’t you guys going bat shit crazy over the other 48 people that got killed the same day???
Let’s be real: both sides—MAGA and the "woke"—have had their moments of acting out when things don’t go their way. Nobody gets to sit on a high horse and pretend their side is completely innocent.
Violence, destruction, and chaos should be condemned no matter who does it. We shouldn't excuse bad behavior just because it's coming from our "team" or say, “Well, remember when they did it?”
If we want to move forward as a country, we need to hold everyone to the same standard. No more finger-pointing. No more justifications. Wrong is wrong—period.
This was a politically motivated targeted assassination.
You do realize the GOP will lose Congress in the mid-terms right? Gonna get ugly.
Bigly.
Have you seen the latest polls, Dems are polling worse than Pubs and I think it is because they are not offer solutions. The Dems are just planning on running on the fact they are not Trump, and if they do I think they will be disappointed. I also don't think Trans athletes and immigration is a winning combo. The Dems need to find their voice and again not just we are not Trump.
Poll: Neither political party gets good marks on honesty
A new NBC News Decision Desk Poll powered by SurveyMonkey finds pluralities of Americans saying politicians in both parties are sometimes or always dishonest.
www.nbcnews.com
Bullit: both sides are the same
Instead of calling the Minnesota governor after the tragedy, Trump calls him names and says he is incompetent.
Bullit: both sides are the same
Wait and see. The impact of his rambling incoherent policy 'statements' havent' come to fruit yet.Have you seen the latest polls, Dems are polling worse than Pubs and I think it is because they are not offer solutions. The Dems are just planning on running on the fact they are not Trump, and if they do I think they will be disappointed. I also don't think Trans athletes and immigration is a winning combo. The Dems need to find their voice and again not just we are not Trump.
Poll: Neither political party gets good marks on honesty
A new NBC News Decision Desk Poll powered by SurveyMonkey finds pluralities of Americans saying politicians in both parties are sometimes or always dishonest.
And then theres the bigbootyful bill that's full of stuff for the rich while taking from the middle class and poor.
It's already starting to be felt by some. The funding cuts are causing job losses. It's only going to get worse. They are passing this POS bill because they know they gone in 1.5 years.
Phew.
LOL when has the left not burned a town down during a protest? Ferguson, Minneapolis, Saint Paul, Seattle, Washington D C Oregon, Atlanta New York City Las Angeles... I mean I could go on.....
Even AI thinks you both are the same.
Assigning blame for property damage during protests based on political affiliation is complex and often depends on the specific context of the event and the individuals involved.
While some sources suggest that support for violence was slightly higher among Democrats than Republicans in the lead-up to the summer of 2020, they also indicate that actual incidents of violence were significantly higher among Republicans.
It's crucial to consider that protests, regardless of their cause, can attract individuals with varying political beliefs, and not all protesters affiliated with a particular party necessarily engage in or condone violent acts or property destruction.
The perception of who causes more damage during protests can also be influenced by factors like media portrayal and partisan biases. Ultimately, attributing damage solely to one political party oversimplifies the issue and overlooks the diversity of individuals involved in protests.
Ask AI how Trump’s lies compare to previous presidents. Ask how his rhetoric and name calling compares. Have it list presidents who had followers attack the Capitol. Ask AI if both sides want poor people to have health care and kids to have food. Have Ai list the mass shooters. Ask which side wants to fund SS and Medicare. Both sides my arse. Did Biden or Obama pardon rioters who attacked cops? Come on man. Both sides???
Last edited:
okay asked.
Does Josh Hawley want to make sure SS and Medicare are funded I used Josh because I cannot vote for other senators from other states. Yes, Senator Hawley has expressed a strong desire to ensure that Social Security and Medicare are adequately funded and protected.
- Introduction of the "Keep Our Promises Act": This legislation aims to exempt Social Security and Medicare from the debt ceiling, meaning the Treasury Department could continue borrowing to fund these programs even if Congress fails to raise the debt limit for other government spending.
- Emphasis on protecting beneficiaries: He believes that beneficiaries of these programs should be confident that their benefits will be paid in full and on time.
- Opposition to using these programs as leverage: Hawley asserts that Social Security and Medicare are not "bargaining chips" and should not be used as leverage in negotiations over the debt limit.
- Alignment with former President Trump's position: He has referenced former President Trump's stance that Social Security and Medicare should not be cut.
- Public statements opposing cuts: He has repeatedly stated his opposition to any cuts to Social Security and Medicare.
While both parties may express concern for vulnerable populations, their differing ideologies on the role of government lead to distinct policy approaches regarding healthcare and food assistance. Democrats generally favor expanding government programs, while Republicans tend to prefer more limited government intervention. These differences often manifest in debates over funding levels and program design.
mass shootings
Experts say that mass shooters are rarely motivated by politics, and there is no evidence to support claims that many mass shooters belong to a specific political party.
Some sources suggest that mass shooters are more often apolitical and do not affiliate with a mainstream political party.
While one report mentions that all U.S. extremist mass killings in 2022 were linked to the far right, it's important to note that this is a specific type of mass shooting and may not be representative of all such events
I noticed you left of Hillary rioters wonder why? Don't pic and choose my friend that fits your narrative
Some protesters sprayed graffiti on cars and buildings and destroyed shop windows, local media in Portland reported.
“Many in the crowd are trying to get anarchist groups to stop destroying property, anarchists refusing. Others encouraged to leave area,” the department said on Twitter after declaring the demonstration a riot.
Mass Shooters. As thousands of people marched, some vandalised shop windows, lit firecrackers and set waste bins on fire.
An estimated 4,000 protesters chanted “We reject the president-elect!”, with some throwing objects at police, prompting several arrests.
Both sides are the same bro. Do you know how absurd a statement that is about literally every topic? Get your head out of the sand.
The violence and incitement are coming from Trump
Words & Phrases We Could Do Without
contrarian.substack.com
I honestly ask you, are you any better off or worse from 2000 until now? Now it is true the tariffs may raise inflation the truth is right now inflation is no worse than any time under Biden. Most of the time we all fight amongst ourselves about politics but the truth is our lives continue to be the same no matter what party is in control, honestly getting no better or worse then under either party year to year.
Over the past 24 years, key economic indicators such as inflation, unemployment, income, and GDP growth have shown fluctuations but have generally remained within a stable range. This stability suggests that, for many individuals, daily life has not drastically changed regardless of political leadership. So no matter what you want to say neither party has done much to improve the middle classes lives in the last 24 years I am sure I could go back farther but the results would be the same. No matter how much you and Blinded want to blame the other party the honest truth is our lives continue to be the same no matter who we elect.
Inflation
- 2000: 3.4%
- 2024: 2.9%
- Average Annual Inflation (2000–2024): Approximately 2.5%
Unemployment Rate
- 2000: 3.9%
- 2024: 4.0%
- Average Annual Unemployment Rate (2000–2024): Approximately 5.5%
Median Household Income (Adjusted for Inflation)
- 2000: $70,020
- 2023: $80,610
- Average Annual Growth (2000–2023): Approximately 0.5%
GDP Growth Rate
- 2000: 4.1%
- 2024: 2.8%
- Average Annual Growth (2000–2024): Approximately 2.5%
Yeah I will be interested too, I hope he stands by his convictions. We will see.
Hold on a second,,,,,doesn’t the “Big Beautiful Bill” make permanent all of the Trump tax cuts that extended to almost all middle income taxpayers???
If we don’t get Social Security, Medicare and Medicaid costs under control in 10 years those programs are only going to have funding for about 80% of their current expenses
How are the Dems going to spin them voting FOR tax increases on all Americans as well as not voting for cost cutting to insure the fiscal future of Social Security???
Democrats rallying around burning the country down is not a good look
What is the result? a wealth transfer of TRILLIONS to the top 1%. Middle class folks unable to leave anything to their families because they are gutted by end of life costs. You and I could buy a starter home for a reasonable dollar figure at 22 or 23 years old. Where are those homes today? I have bought nothing but used cars for close to 30 years and started investing in 1985.
Yet my entire life savings could be wiped out in a few years with a health tragedy and the need for long term care.
We had an opportunity to slow down climate change two decades ago. One side fought it tooth and nail. Homeowners insurance rates are going nuts.
But economic issues aren’t everything. A country run by decent people who set a good example is a bigger issue to me. Accepting massive corruption so my guy can win is not on my to do list.
Having empathy for the less fortunate as a country is not a sin.
Listen Social Security is a earned Benefit not a handout, All workers and employers pay into it with every paycheck and those contributions go into a trust fund. This is not a tax lets be clear. No reason for the goverment to have to step in on that.
Now yes, Medicare and Medicaid are far more financially stressed than Social Security. We can all agree Healthcare costs in the U.S. are significantly higher than in other developed nations, often without better outcomes.
So to get those cost under control do you think there is a strong economic and ethical justification for the government to negotiate cost controls? For things like Prescription Drugs, Hospital billing practices administrative overhead
Do some research Duck... Again if you look at both parties only under your favorite President did the wealth of the top 1% not increase.
Obama it increased almost 2% Joe Biden was minimal. But according to you they should have closed that gap if both parties are not the same why didn't we see that gap close?
| Administration | Top 1% Wealth Share (Start) | Top 1% Wealth Share (End) | |
|---|---|---|---|
| George W. Bush | 23% (1989) | 28.1% | |
| Barack Obama | 28.1% (2009) | 30.4% (2014) | |
| Donald Trump | 30.4% (2014) | 30.4% (2019) | T |
| Joe Biden | 30.4% (2019) | 30.8% (2024) |
Wealth Inequality: The share of wealth held by the top 1% increased from 23% in 1989 to 28.1% in 2009.
Barack Omama
Wealth Inequality: The share of wealth held by the top 1% increased to 30.4% by 2014.
Donald Trump
Wealth Inequality: The share of wealth held by the top 1% remained high at 30.4% in 2019.
Joe Biden
Wealth Inequality: The share of wealth held by the top 1% slightly increased to 30.8% by 2024.
Like I said economic issues aren’t everything. So if you are saying economically there isn’t much difference why vote for the corrupt a-hole who sets a horrible example, alienates our cherished allies and causes more upheaval than anyone?
Those people who study such things have noted a significant uptick in politically motivated violence starting in what year??? 2016. Coincidence? No such thing. The GOP has gone totally for one man. Lock, stock and barrel. They are scared shitless to cross him in any way.
Those people who study such things have noted a significant uptick in politically motivated violence starting in what year??? 2016. Coincidence? No such thing. The GOP has gone totally for one man. Lock, stock and barrel. They are scared shitless to cross him in any way.
So if your talking about Trump then yes there is a difference. But I ask you what came first?
The rise of Donald Trump was not over night it is linked to decades of widespread dissatisfaction with traditional political establishments the failure to deliver on the American Dream. Trump’s appeal to some voters was he was an outsider, blunt and critique of the political system, even despite his own wealth and establishment ties. His messaging has resonated with people who felt ignored or betrayed by mainstream politicians, even if they didn’t agree with all his views or actions. And honestly they continue to support him because its not hitting them in the pocket book yet.
So I have pointed out that under all parties the economic inequality widened – So many Many working- and middle-class voters feel left behind, particularly after major economic shifts (e.g., globalization, the 2008 financial crisis, or the COVID-19 pandemic).
Political promises are broken – When elected officials fail to deliver on key issues like healthcare, wage growth, tax fairness, equal and fair debt relief, trust in government erodes.
Perception of elite detachment - A sense that politicians are more connected to corporate or donor interests than to everyday citizens fuels resentment.
Cultural and identity tensions – These often interact with economic frustrations, amplifying divisions and political realignments.
Trump’s appeal to some voters stemmed from his outsider status and blunt critique of the political system, despite his own wealth and establishment ties. His messaging resonated with people who felt ignored or betrayed by mainstream politicians, even if they didn’t agree with all his views or actions.
And Trump 2014? I’d say your stats are completely invalid. You better find somewhere else to prove your point.
You cannot even find the stats to prove your point you just whining like an old man.
According to ChatGPT
- Inequality tends to rise more under Republican administrations, largely due to tax cuts favoring the wealthy and deregulation.
- Under Democratic administrations, inequality often rises more slowly or temporarily declines due to progressive tax and social policies.
- However, globalization and automation are long-term drivers that no president has fully reversed.
