Even Rush Limbaugh has now turned on Trump and his campaign

[bullitpdq68]

On Monday, conservative radio host Rush Limbaugh criticized the re-election campaign legal team of President Donald Trump for not delivering its promised "massive bombshells" of alleged voter fraud that swung the election in favor of President-elect Joe Biden.

"They promised blockbuster stuff, and then nothing happened," Limbaugh said of the days following the legal team's much-discussed November 19 press conference. "And that's just, that's not—well, it's not good."

"You call a gigantic press conference like that, one that lasts an hour," Limbaugh said, "and you announce massive bombshells, then you better have some bombshells, there better be something at that press conference other than what we got."

Rush Limbaugh Criticizes Trump Campaign for Hyping Up 'Nothing' Voter Fraud

"You call a gigantic press conference like that, one that lasts an hour," Limbaugh said. "And you announce massive bombshells, then you better have some bombshells."

www.newsweek.com

 

[SadButTrue]

I think it would be more accurate to say he turned on the legal team but they are associated with Trump. Limbaughs point from the beginning has been that election integrity is what matters more than Trump winning. At this point it would be VERY hard to show enough fraud to change a states results but not hard at all to show fraud. Most of the cases being tossed are because the impact would be minimal not that there wasn't a case just not a case to change the election. The legal teams assertions were huge vote changes are possible but have not been forthcoming with how.

One thing that is never discussed on this forum is the fact that there could be just as much or more fraud on the trump votes.

 

[kaskaskiakid]

One thing that is never discussed on this forum is the fact that there could be just as much or more fraud on the trump votes.

I'm shocked someone could even suggest such a thing!! Blasphemy!!

 

[bullitpdq68]

I think it would be more accurate to say he turned on the legal team but they are associated with Trump. Limbaughs point from the beginning has been that election integrity is what matters more than Trump winning. At this point it would be VERY hard to show enough fraud to change a states results but not hard at all to show fraud. Most of the cases being tossed are because the impact would be minimal not that there wasn't a case just not a case to change the election. The legal teams assertions were huge vote changes are possible but have not been forthcoming with how.

I don't think any cases are being tossed because they would not change the outcome. My understanding is most cases are being tossed because they have not brought up any examples of fraud? Citing some of the dismissals below. If you have any examples of cases being won because of fraud I would like to see them. I personally don't like mail in ballots I do think they could be used as to commit fraud, but so far we have not seen any of that and when pressed by judges poll watchers back down on thier claims of fraud.

As for calling out Trump yes his legal team works for Trump he himself has made the same claims of widespread fraud and that without it he would have won the election by a landslide. Those are the exact claims his lawyers are making. So when Rush calls out his lawyers for not producing evidence he is calling out Trump for also not producing. You both cannot make the same claim but only one be in the wrong.

The judge pressed Goldstein to answer the specific question: “Are you claiming that there is any fraud in connection with these 592 disputed ballots?” To which Goldstein replied: “To my knowledge at present, no.”

On Thursday, a judge rejected the Trump campaign’s attempt to throw out absentee ballots in the Bucks County case, noting, “The parties specifically stipulated in their comprehensive stipulation of facts that there exists no evidence of any fraud, misconduct, or any impropriety with respect to the challenged ballots. There is nothing in the record and nothing alleged that would lead to the conclusion that any of the challenged ballots were submitted by someone not qualified or entitled to vote in this election.”

Trump has repeatedly claimed that glitches in voting machines were evidence of foul play, Langhofer also threw cold water on that idea, saying instead the case concerned “a limited number of cases” of “good-faith errors in operating machines.” The Trump campaign has since dropped this case.

Lawyers representing Trump’s campaign sent a letter to Attorney General William Barr on Nov. 5 alleging “criminal voter fraud” in Nevada. But lawyers representing Trump never made that allegation in court filings. Instead, as in many of the other Trump campaign election cases, the Nevada filings focus on much smaller claims, including questions about the use of a scanning machine to verify signatures and whether observers had proper access to observe vote counting.

 

[3Rfan]

They weren't alleging fraud but were alleging the ballots were not valid because of process (process established to prevent fraud) not because the person voting was attempting fraud. There doesn't have to be fraud for a vote to be invalid.
I don't know what the specific claim was in this case but for example, if a voter (registered legal voter) cast a ballot after the polls closed that would be a not valid vote but wouldn't be fraud by the voter.

Give it up dude, HE LOST!!! If they would happen to get any state to throw out their votes and pick new Trump electors you just think the protests that went on earlier were bad.

 

[kaskaskiakid]

The best line I've heard about the election - It's poetic justice that Rush Limbaugh is going to his grave knowing that Trump lost to Obama's vice president!!