ADVERTISEMENT

Democrats approve the tearing down of Mt. Rushmore

Distancefix

Well-Known Member
Apr 17, 2020
1,026
690
113
A recent deleted tweet said as much, and in this tweet, the DNC said the Mt. Rushmore monument is an imposition on that region and basically called for its destruction.

Then they wrote that Trump is going to Mt. Rushmore to glorify white supremacy.

We all know the answer but why is it that Democrats never get asked about this insane stuff?

Why isn't Joe Biden being asked if Mt. Rushmore is sovereign native American territory?

Why is it that hard left can put out stories that America has no rights to its land and that history is just evil western occupations.

And JOE Biden is never asked a single question about it, how?

Well, he's hiding and it's not about principle, and the selective weaponization of outrage is constantly used by the democrat party, and this why the situation of riots and lawlessness lives today.

Where the riots are happening are ALL DEMOCRAT CITIES. WHERE THE POLICE ARE SUPPOSEDLY TARGETING MINORITIES.

And yet do you see the outrage ever directed at Joe Biden and the democrats? Never. It's always directed at the system or country more broadly. Leaving the Republicans to answer for the evil past or our country.
 
I have yet to read or hear that the DNC's official position is to tear down Mt. Rushmore. Appreciate a link on that one.

The idea is nonsense though, and never going to happen, just more hype from the fearmongering right. I hope the Crazy Horse Monument is done in my lifetime. They both are amazing monuments.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Arcola
If you don't think there is an assault on American history then I can't help that.

NYT has an amazing tweet today openly calling for the destruction of the monument. Exciting stuff. The notion of these leftwing media outlets that all human predation began with the arrival of the west is so patently insane.

The same NYT building built on tribal land expropriated from Native Americans for a handful of beads from the Iroquois.

Mt. Rushmore land used belonged to the Lakota in starting in 1775, before that the Lakota had driven out the Cheyenne with great bloodshed, and the Cheyenne had only recently stolen the land from Kiawah who had stolen it from.... Bottom line human history did not begin with the west.

According to these people, all human evil began with the West.
So the take is now that everything the West has done is bad, and everything good it has done is an outgrowth of the bad.

 
  • Like
Reactions: Chris Gardner
My guess would be that the majority of Americans would favor removing Confederate statues from public grounds, and leave the statues of great Americans standing. My opinion.

This essay explains why Confederate monuments should come down from an older black woman and poet's perspective, and whether you agree or not, is worth reading. Although lengthy, she cuts right to the crux of her disdain of Confederate monuments.

YOU WANT A CONFEDERATE MONUMENT⁉️ MY BODY IS A CONDERATE MONUMENT‼️

The black people I come from were owned and raped by the white people I come from. Who dares to tell me to celebrate them?

By Caroline Randall Williams
Ms. Williams is a poet.
June 26, 2020

NASHVILLE — I have rape-colored skin. My light-brown-blackness is a living testament to the rules, the practices, the causes of the Old South.

If there are those who want to remember the legacy of the Confederacy, if they want monuments, well, then, my body is a monument. My skin is a monument.

Dead Confederates are honored all over this country — with cartoonish private statues, solemn public monuments and even in the names of United States Army bases. It fortifies and heartens me to witness the protests against this practice and the growing clamor from serious, nonpartisan public servants to redress it. But there are still those — like President Trump and the Senate majority leader, Mitch McConnell — who cannot understand the difference between rewriting and reframing the past. I say it is not a matter of “airbrushing” history, but of adding a new perspective.

I am a black, Southern woman, and of my immediate white male ancestors, all of them were rapists. My very existence is a relic of slavery and Jim Crow.

According to the rule of hypodescent (the social and legal practice of assigning a genetically mixed-race person to the race with less social power) I am the daughter of two black people, the granddaughter of four black people, the great-granddaughter of eight black people. Go back one more generation and it gets less straightforward, and more sinister. As far as family history has always told, and as modern DNA testing has allowed me to confirm, I am the descendant of black women who were domestic servants and white men who raped their help.

It is an extraordinary truth of my life that I am biologically more than half white, and yet I have no white people in my genealogy in living memory. No. Voluntary. Whiteness. I am more than half white, and none of it was consensual. White Southern men — my ancestors — took what they wanted from women they did not love, over whom they had extraordinary power, and then failed to claim their children.

What is a monument but a standing memory? An artifact to make tangible the truth of the past. My body and blood are a tangible truth of the South and its past. The black people I come from were owned by the white people I come from. The white people I come from fought and died for their Lost Cause. And I ask you now, who dares to tell me to celebrate them? Who dares to ask me to accept their mounted pedestals?

You cannot dismiss me as someone who doesn’t understand. You cannot say it wasn’t my family members who fought and died. My blackness does not put me on the other side of anything. It puts me squarely at the heart of the debate. I don’t just come from the South. I come from Confederates. I’ve got rebel-gray blue blood coursing my veins. My great-grandfather Will was raised with the knowledge that Edmund Pettus was his father. Pettus, the storied Confederate general, the grand dragon of the Ku Klux Klan, the man for whom Selma’s Bloody Sunday Bridge is named. So I am not an outsider who makes these demands. I am a great-great-granddaughter.

And here I’m called to say that there is much about the South that is precious to me. I do my best teaching and writing here. There is, however, a peculiar model of Southern pride that must now, at long last, be reckoned with.

This is not an ignorant pride but a defiant one. It is a pride that says, “Our history is rich, our causes are justified, our ancestors lie beyond reproach.” It is a pining for greatness, if you will, a wish again for a certain kind of American memory. A monument-worthy memory.

But here’s the thing: Our ancestors don’t deserve your unconditional pride. Yes, I am proud of every one of my black ancestors who survived slavery. They earned that pride, by any decent person’s reckoning. But I am not proud of the white ancestors whom I know, by virtue of my very existence, to be bad actors.

Among the apologists for the Southern cause and for its monuments, there are those who dismiss the hardships of the past. They imagine a world of benevolent masters, and speak with misty eyes of gentility and honor and the land. They deny plantation rape, or explain it away, or question the degree of frequency with which it occurred.

To those people it is my privilege to say, I am proof. I am proof that whatever else the South might have been, or might believe itself to be, it was and is a space whose prosperity and sense of romance and nostalgia were built upon the grievous exploitation of black life.

The dream version of the Old South never existed. Any manufactured monument to that time in that place tells half a truth at best. The ideas and ideals it purports to honor are not real. To those who have embraced these delusions: Now is the time to re-examine your position.

Either you have been blind to a truth that my body’s story forces you to see, or you really do mean to honor the oppressors at the expense of the oppressed, and you must at last acknowledge your emotional investment in a legacy of hate.

Either way, I say the monuments of stone and metal, the monuments of cloth and wood, all the man-made monuments, must come down. I defy any sentimental Southerner to defend our ancestors to me. I am quite literally made of the reasons to strip them of their laurels.

Caroline Randall Williams (@caroranwill) is the author of “Lucy Negro, Redux” and “Soul Food Love,” and a writer in residence at Vanderbilt University.
 
  • Like
Reactions: HomeyR
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest posts

ADVERTISEMENT