Debate
- Thread starter vbsideout
- Start date
Prediction ...
Carly Fiorina will be the first woman president or vp in US history.
Hillary will be the first Clinton rejected by the new millennial's but not the last.
Correct prediction: Carly will NEVER be president of the USA. You need to listen to her speak for 30 minutes straight. She is even less likable than Hillary.
I have seen her speak in person, she is a brilliant communicator.
Hillary on the other hand is said to be a social network prodigy.
Did I mention she invented E-MAIL ?
Noticed that not one Democrat on this site has asked why the Minority hating, War on Women, for the RICH ONLY, Conservative Tea Party Right is overwhelmingly supporting a brilliant black man and an intelligent woman for their president.
Answer ;
It's not about right and wrong...
It's about winning
That's why I am no longer a Democrat
By the way, Republicans are no better than you....
If you honestly believe she is a brilliant communicator that is one of the saddest things I have ever read.
Let's be real. If Romney was more likable he would have beaten Obama. She isn't likable dude. She is snarky and annoying. There is a reason people like you and Carly don't run for president.
Dr. Dishonest, (made a living on science and now ignores it) is at 20% and Ms. Firethemall, is at 3.3%. Combined that's not even 25%. I don't think that is OVERWHELMINGLY!!!
http://www.realclearpolitics.com/ep..._republican_presidential_nomination-3823.html
There is something funny about Fiorina running on her record as a businesswoman when she was a horrendous CEO who destroyed a tremendous amount of shareholder capital.
No joke - the stock popped 7% on the day she was fired.
No joke - the stock popped 7% on the day she was fired.
The honest truth is that both parties are scared that they have a good chance of nominating a flawed, weak candidate. The only thing helping them sleep better at night is that the other party is likely to do the same.
Trump, Carson, Bush, Clinton, Cruz, and Sanders are all very flawed candidates who are very beatable. We're talking about the 2 people most likely to be the D nominee and 3 of the 5 people most likely to be the R nominee.
Can you imagine Trump, Carson, Jeb, or Cruz beating Obama or Clinton? I can't. Can you imagine what GWB's positive campaign message and Hispanic outreach would do against Hillary or Bernie? Etc.
Trump, Carson, Bush, Clinton, Cruz, and Sanders are all very flawed candidates who are very beatable. We're talking about the 2 people most likely to be the D nominee and 3 of the 5 people most likely to be the R nominee.
Can you imagine Trump, Carson, Jeb, or Cruz beating Obama or Clinton? I can't. Can you imagine what GWB's positive campaign message and Hispanic outreach would do against Hillary or Bernie? Etc.
Last edited:
Both parties wish they could just pick a savior and move on. The difference is the Rs appear to have one or two of them running in their primaries (Kasich? Rubio?), whereas the Ds don't seem to have anyone.
Duck, really?
She was a CEO at a major corporation where competition for the job was fierce.
You guys are acting like she was manager of your nearby McDonald's .
Partisan politics has blinded you of all reality.
And she totally sucked at the job!
There's a big difference between her and Romney - one of them was actually good at what they did.
Yes, I get it. If your a liberal Democrat woman .... hence, Hillary Clinton, Elizabeth Warren, Debbie Wasserman Shultz, Rachel Maddow your a GOD.
If your a Pro-Life Conservative, not so much.
Scout for crying out loud please learn the difference in your and you're. Make that same mistake 3 or 4 times a day.
Scout, can you provide a link where any of the regulars on this board have said those women are Gods or even been extremely positive about them???. Only the Cowherd crush on Hillary comes to mind. You are making stuff up.
You're just making stuff up now.
We are talking about someone who got fired after tanking a large company. go look up some news articles from 2005. She was a laughingstock of the business world.
Mentioning palin is just a way to point out that a woman can be conservative and totally unqualified to be president.
Warren on the other hand has great credentials....
Did you know she won the Miss America Pageant ???
Warren cares more about protecting your financial interests than anyone actually running. But continue on with your charade.
Just finished watching the debate.
1) The format of every question pitting one candidate against another was ridiculous.
2) Fiorina clearly helped herself the most.
3) Trump is another Obama. Slogans rather than substance.
Trump, Graham, Pataki, and Bush would have to win without my support. At this point I would hold my nose to vote for Christie, Kasich, or Huckabee. The rest have things I could get strongly behind. My personal favorites today (still very early) would be in alphabetical order....Carson, Cruz, Fiorina, Paul, Rubio, and Walker.Though they are in many ways very different, they are all principled in what they believe.
1) The format of every question pitting one candidate against another was ridiculous.
2) Fiorina clearly helped herself the most.
3) Trump is another Obama. Slogans rather than substance.
Trump, Graham, Pataki, and Bush would have to win without my support. At this point I would hold my nose to vote for Christie, Kasich, or Huckabee. The rest have things I could get strongly behind. My personal favorites today (still very early) would be in alphabetical order....Carson, Cruz, Fiorina, Paul, Rubio, and Walker.Though they are in many ways very different, they are all principled in what they believe.
Warren was 27 when I entered the workforce, she's done nothing for me.
If you want to keep believing that you need more larger government in your life to bring equality to the "World" then great, I hope you find that liberal utopia you're missing.
As for me...
I"ll just leave the "SAVE THE PLANET" thing up to GOD...
he's better equipped.
_______________________________
There folks, you have it...
Sun worshipping Democrats believe in MAN and "his" undisputed Science.
True Conservatives believe in GOD and "his" undisputed destiny for mankind.
_______________________________
Is it possible that we both may be RIGHT?
I have to wonder how most Rep. that want to rule the world and increase their Empire think they can do so while decreasing the size of government. War is not like risk where you roll the dice and move pieces. It actually has huge costs in treasure and most of all lives of our young people. War is no way to decrease government spending and they all claim that boots on the ground is the option in the Gulf states accept Paul. None of the gulf states want to invest their blood and treasure or even take in their neighbors refugees. Sounds like something we should try to fix. It has worked so well for us in the pass
Rand Paul is a very smart man who believes deeply in isolationism and the power of the people over the Federal Government .
Tea Party folks like me respect him and his interpretation of the Constitution but...
we can not get past his Neville Chamberlain tendencies.
Would love to support him "if" he would cave on those points, he will not.
By the way...
while you're having someone show you how to google the Planned Parenthood videos, have them also ...
SEE; MUNICH AGREEMENT 1938
They don't actually intend to shrink the government. That's how. They intend to deficit spend like there's no tomorrow.
Similar threads
