ADVERTISEMENT

Class 2 coaches

OrangeTautAmericancicada-size_restricted.gif
 
  • Like
Reactions: B Boucher_9
Normal public Class 2 school develops and rolls through the season for better or worse with the kids that live in the district.

Lutheran North magically finds ways to get 5-10 transfers from the 3 million person St. Louis metro area who are either 6'5" 330 lbs and athletic or kids who run a sub 4.4 40.

Then they get to play the victim of all the "abuse and hate" from people who call them out on obviously playing by a different set of rules from everyone else while racking up 10+ wins a year while playing tragically overmatched teams.
 
I'll be rooting Lamar or Blair Oaks if they run into them. Living around St. Louis, it just gets old seeing kids transfer for obvious athletic reasons and see MSHSAA look the other way. I mean, the kid could end up being one of the best kids St. Louis ever produced. Non-athletic reasons my a&#.

This is beyond ridiculous. Enforce the doggone rules.


yet this year they enforced those same rules ona kid transfering from Lutheran st. charles to Elsberry stating it was for athletic reasons LOL. They didn't let him play even after an appeal. MSHSAA is crooked. Hunter Grills is the kids name if you want to look up the situation.
 
  • Like
Reactions: darkstar
Hopefully LSC has enough backbone to fight this kid's transfer. I'd like to see Grills bring a 14th Amendment argument (equal protection) to court.
 
Hopefully LSC has enough backbone to fight this kid's transfer. I'd like to see Grills bring a 14th Amendment argument (equal protection) to court.
Unfortunately, it's us who lack backbone. We had a chance about 12 years ago to have separate public/private playoffs and voted it down. Now we have to accept this sh!t and it's our own fault.
 
Unfortunately, it's us who lack backbone. We had a chance about 12 years ago to have separate public/private playoffs and voted it down. Now we have to accept this sh!t and it's our own fault.

Sounds like LSC had the backbone to fight a kid transferring to Elsberry. Why not fight one going to LN? I agree with your point though. Time to seperate public and private. St. Louis is the wild freaking west.
 
The problem with private schools in MO is every other sport but football.

There’s not a single football team complaining about LN or Trinity or whoever having 50 D1 athletes on their team. Nobody cares. Get over it.
 
  • Like
Reactions: revno
The problem with private schools in MO is every other sport but football.

There’s not a single football team complaining about LN or Trinity or whoever having 50 D1 athletes on their team. Nobody cares. Get over it.

Obviously a lot of people care or this wouldn't be a recurring thread. If YOU don't care, then quit reading and responding. The rest of us will talk about whatever we want. Nobody got time for your negativity.
 
Obviously a lot of people care or this wouldn't be a recurring thread. If YOU don't care, then quit reading and responding. The rest of us will talk about whatever we want. Nobody got time for your negativity.

It's a recurring thread because 3 people post every day on here about it.

And social media gives them a megaphone to complain about insignificant things.
 
yet this year they enforced those same rules ona kid transfering from Lutheran st. charles to Elsberry stating it was for athletic reasons LOL. They didn't let him play even after an appeal. MSHSAA is crooked. Hunter Grills is the kids name if you want to look up the situation.

It's all about geography... Coming from St Charles you can't checkmark that box on the transfer form you transfering for "safety" reasons.
 
It's all about geography... Coming from St Charles you can't checkmark that box on the transfer form you transfering for "safety" reasons.

Why not? Feeling unsafe at a school (any school) would appear to be a subjective experience.

I'll use St. Vincent as an example. If the HC there decided to recruit his allotted area (50 mile radius) would athletes from Jackson, Cape, Perryville, and Ste Genevieve be allowed to mark "felt unsafe at school" and if they weren't given a waiver, what criteria was used to determine that a kid from Vashon or one of the Hazelwood's "FELT" (again subjective) more unsafe than a kid at Jackson or Perryville?

That sounds racist to me.
 
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest posts

ADVERTISEMENT