Obviously Ohio St earned the 4th spot with that win last night. Bama will be outside looking in at the 5 spot. Notre Dame shouldn't even be talked about in this situation. Coming from a ND Fan.
Heck id be happy with 8Should go to 16 team playoff like the lower divisions
Of the contenders, USC's strength of schedule rank was much higher than the others
Based on what?? Or is it your opinion...
Usc got smashed by nd
They showed it on ESPN. Their SOS was something like 12th in the country. OSU and Bama's were far worse.
Thats interesting...a google search for end of season SOS shows Bama and OSU well above USC (highest I saw them ranked was 22nd)
FWIW, according to ESPNs FPI...
1. Bama
2. OSU
14. USC
I think someone at espn posted incorrect numbers. SOR and SOS, OSU and Bama are higher than USC for sure online. But Bama's schedule really isnt impressive to me. A lot of their opponents had disappointing years.
Sorry. That was 100% sarcasm aimed at those people and those voters.How is ND one of the choices? They have 3 losses. Dont be one of those people.
USC is a 2 loss conference champ, jump like OSU.
committee chose correctly,bama over osu. conf champ shouldnt matter,didnt last year and two years prior. pick the best 4. hopefully this starts a change toward 8 team playoff. five p5 champs get in,3 at large bids.
I don't think people believe Georgia is one of the top 4 teams....but conference champs do and should matter because it means they play 1 more game against a (most likely) top 10 team.
All that said...Bama was the right pick. 1 loss team vs a 2 loss in this specific scenario meant something even if it means 2 teams from the same conference
i havent heard one person say georgia isnt a playoff team besides yourself. no problem everyone is entitled to their opinion. a one loss p5 team who just beat a very good auburn team who just beat bama in the iron bowl. a bama team who is the 4 seed. conference champs didnt matter to the committee this year or last year. its the best 4 teams regardless of conference titles. regarding the games they are very hard picks,i think clemson eeks out a win vs bama. ou and gawja are both damn good. i think the bulldogs will put more talent on the field but mayfield is a beast. i think well see an acc vs sec final.
I think the committee selected the 4 best teams. On the face it would appear a bad loss is given more weight than "quality" wins. However, anyone else think that maybe the committee members were sitting there discussing "Are we really going to pit the OSU against Clemson? Do we want another playoff blowout?" I think in the end they may have just determined Alabama and Clemson will be a more competitive game and gave the Tide the nod.
I mentioned this to someone I was talking to. The committee took a lot of flak last year for putting OSU in over Penn State then got blown out by Clemson. However, that should not factor in at all, IMO....but Im sure it did.
Ohio State had 3 quality wins better than Bama's best win....but their loss to Iowa was very bad, so I agree that a bad loss is more heavily weighted than quality wins. I still don't think they selected the 4 best teams...but the 4 right teams.
The NAIA used to do 8 teams in the 70s and into the very early 80s. It was perfect. A #8 in Division I is fully capable of upsetting a #1. Not likely, but good games likely.
Agreed. And I don't have a problem autobidding in a non power 5 team if they go undefeated like UCF as a 6th team.I agree. 8 teams is ideal. 5 conference champs and 3 at-large.
Ohio St. lost to #7 in the Big Ten by 31 points... Alabama lost to #6 in the Nation Auburn by 6 points. It is a no brainer.