Bradford demands trade.
- Thread starter Duck_walk
- Start date
Jason La Canfora, CBSSports.com: "Boy, Sam Bradford's got it tough. If only this kid could catch a break. You have to really feel for him, suddenly desperate for a trade but having virtually no trade value even before he starting whining and crying about leaving Philadelphia. I mean, there was scant interest in him as an impending free agent, and somehow he found it in his heart to accept $22 million guaranteed from the Eagles with unrestricted free agency just days away. And now those heartless bastards in Philly have the indignity to trade up for the right to select, say, a quarterback project out of North Dakota State who might or might not be ready to start in 2017. Of course, Eagles GM Howie Roseman also publicly declared Bradford as their Week 1 starter for this season. But how could they try to look after the long-term future of their franchise at the same time Big Game Bradford is already atop the depth chart? The temerity of it all! Aw, life isn't fair! I would throw a temper tantrum too, Sam."
Like Bradford or not.. that is funny right there. Also, Isnt it a little strange that on a Missouri Football board that so many people still cant get his last name right? (not picking on you hangman, it happens a lot)
Last edited:
LOL.... I like Daniels better that way the guy does not have 2 first names!
Who's had a better career Bradford or Daniel? From this armchair I'm going with Chase. If you count only bankroll yeah sure Sam is on top. Also in career losses and season ending injuries. Looking at their futures, respect earned from their former teams, winning record, stuff that really matters I gotta go with Chase. The media really dogs Bradford's record as a starter, probably rightly so given the money he's been paid.
Better career? Really? I guess from the thought that everyone loves the backup... Other than that, you are out of your mind. If they had that much faith in Daniel they would have just brought him over as the starter and never invested the money in Bradford. I realize that I give Sam the benefit of the doubt and look through Crimson and Cream glasses. and admit that Bradford has not had near the career I had hoped to this point.... But only a Mizzou, honk, would make such a statement
Agreed. Daniels has looked good when he has played. He's good enough if his team were to catch lightning in a bottle. Bradford is too. I like both of them a lot.
