ADVERTISEMENT

A Rape Survivor Speaks Out About Transgender Bathrooms

bullitpdq68

Well-Known Member
Sep 22, 2005
13,279
5,398
113
Home of the Cubs!!
By Kaeley Triller

Full story here http://thefederalist.com/2015/11/23/a-rape-survivor-speaks-out-about-transgender-bathrooms/

Wake up!” I wanted to scream at her. “Can’t you see what’s going on? Do something about it!”

It’s the same desperate inclination I’m fighting today. Everywhere I read in the news, there’s talk of another school or gym or business that is boldly adopting “progressive” new locker room policies designed to create equal rights for people who identify as transgender. These policies allow transgender individuals to use the locker room consistent with the sex they identify as their own, regardless of anatomy.

While some have proposed a third option for transgender people (single-occupancy restrooms and showers), this option has been largely struck down, and employees are prohibited from suggesting it, as it is considered discriminatory and emotionally damaging to a group of people who are working so hard to fit in. The solution? Anyone can use whatever restroom he or she wants without being questioned.



“Wake up!” I want to scream. “Can’t you see what’s going on? Do something about it!”

Despite the many reports of sexual abuse and assault that exist in our world, there’s an even larger number of victims who never tell about it. The reason? They’re afraid no one will believe them. Even worse, they’re terrified of a reality they already innately know to be true: even if people did know, they wouldn’t do anything to help. They’re not worth protecting. Even silence feels better than that.

Survivors are terrified of a reality they already innately know to be true: even if people did know, they wouldn’t do anything to help.
There’s no way to make everyone happy in the situation of transgender locker room use. So the priority ought to be finding a way to keep everyone safe. I’d much rather risk hurting a smaller number of people’s feelings by asking transgender people to use a single-occupancy restroom that still offers safety than risk jeopardizing the safety of thousands of women and kids with a policy that gives would-be predators a free pass.

Is it ironic to no one that being “progressive” actually sets women’s lib back about a century? What of my right to do my darndest to insist that the first time my daughter sees the adult male form it will be because she’s chosen it, not because it’s forced upon her? What of our emotional and physical rights? Unless and until you’ve lined a bathroom door with a towel for protection, you can’t tell me the risk isn’t there.

For me, healing looks like staring at the little girl in a Polaroid photo and validating her need to be seen, heard, and protected instead of hating it. It looks like telling my story, even the parts I can never make pretty, in hopes it will help break the anonymity of survivors and create a sense of responsibility in others to act.

I read these reports, and my heart starts to race. They can’t be serious. Let me be clear: I am not saying that transgender people are predators. Not by a long shot. What I amsaying is that there are countless deviant men in this world who will pretend to be transgender as a means of gaining access to the people they want to exploit, namely women and children. It already happens. Just Google Jason Pomares, Norwood Smith Burnes, or Taylor Buehler, for starters.

There are countless deviant men in this world who will pretend to be transgender as a means of gaining access to the people they want to exploit.
While I feel a deep sense of empathy for what must be a very difficult situation for transgender people, at the beginning and end of the day, it is nothing short of negligent to instate policies that elevate the emotional comfort of a relative few over the physical safety of a large group of vulnerable people

Why would people knowingly invite further exploitation by creating policies with no safeguards in place to protect them from injury? With zero screening options to ensure that biological males who enter locker rooms actually identify as female, how could a woman be sure the person staring at her wasn’t exploiting her? Why is it okay to make her wonder?
 
  • Like
Reactions: coachperk
By Kaeley Triller

Full story here http://thefederalist.com/2015/11/23/a-rape-survivor-speaks-out-about-transgender-bathrooms/

Wake up!” I wanted to scream at her. “Can’t you see what’s going on? Do something about it!”

It’s the same desperate inclination I’m fighting today. Everywhere I read in the news, there’s talk of another school or gym or business that is boldly adopting “progressive” new locker room policies designed to create equal rights for people who identify as transgender. These policies allow transgender individuals to use the locker room consistent with the sex they identify as their own, regardless of anatomy.

While some have proposed a third option for transgender people (single-occupancy restrooms and showers), this option has been largely struck down, and employees are prohibited from suggesting it, as it is considered discriminatory and emotionally damaging to a group of people who are working so hard to fit in. The solution? Anyone can use whatever restroom he or she wants without being questioned.



“Wake up!” I want to scream. “Can’t you see what’s going on? Do something about it!”

Despite the many reports of sexual abuse and assault that exist in our world, there’s an even larger number of victims who never tell about it. The reason? They’re afraid no one will believe them. Even worse, they’re terrified of a reality they already innately know to be true: even if people did know, they wouldn’t do anything to help. They’re not worth protecting. Even silence feels better than that.

Survivors are terrified of a reality they already innately know to be true: even if people did know, they wouldn’t do anything to help.
There’s no way to make everyone happy in the situation of transgender locker room use. So the priority ought to be finding a way to keep everyone safe. I’d much rather risk hurting a smaller number of people’s feelings by asking transgender people to use a single-occupancy restroom that still offers safety than risk jeopardizing the safety of thousands of women and kids with a policy that gives would-be predators a free pass.

Is it ironic to no one that being “progressive” actually sets women’s lib back about a century? What of my right to do my darndest to insist that the first time my daughter sees the adult male form it will be because she’s chosen it, not because it’s forced upon her? What of our emotional and physical rights? Unless and until you’ve lined a bathroom door with a towel for protection, you can’t tell me the risk isn’t there.

For me, healing looks like staring at the little girl in a Polaroid photo and validating her need to be seen, heard, and protected instead of hating it. It looks like telling my story, even the parts I can never make pretty, in hopes it will help break the anonymity of survivors and create a sense of responsibility in others to act.

I read these reports, and my heart starts to race. They can’t be serious. Let me be clear: I am not saying that transgender people are predators. Not by a long shot. What I amsaying is that there are countless deviant men in this world who will pretend to be transgender as a means of gaining access to the people they want to exploit, namely women and children. It already happens. Just Google Jason Pomares, Norwood Smith Burnes, or Taylor Buehler, for starters.

There are countless deviant men in this world who will pretend to be transgender as a means of gaining access to the people they want to exploit.
While I feel a deep sense of empathy for what must be a very difficult situation for transgender people, at the beginning and end of the day, it is nothing short of negligent to instate policies that elevate the emotional comfort of a relative few over the physical safety of a large group of vulnerable people

Why would people knowingly invite further exploitation by creating policies with no safeguards in place to protect them from injury? With zero screening options to ensure that biological males who enter locker rooms actually identify as female, how could a woman be sure the person staring at her wasn’t exploiting her? Why is it okay to make her wonder?
I'm quite certain this doesn't exist. This a phobia and attempt to scare you. There are no sexual predators that dress up like women. It just doesn't happen.
 
Cite a single example of someone being sexually assaulted by a transgender person in a restroom. No one has ever come up with one. There is no threat that people are being protected from. This is fearmongering to justify discrimination
 
  • Like
Reactions: coachperk
That is a bad story about rape. Mind explaining what that has to do with transgender people?

This is the classic strawman argument.
 
  • Like
Reactions: coachperk
Why would people knowingly invite further exploitation by creating policies with no safeguards in place to protect them from injury?
I don't know, why don't we screen biological males before they use public restrooms? That group is the overwhelming majority of sexual abusers.
 
  • Like
Reactions: coachperk
Cow , aka, (NM),
I have never put anyone on ignore, but u 2, I mean you 1 , are close. Your PC, BS , holier than thou attitude is getting hard to bear.

NOBODY wants to shower with a dyke or a homo or a wanna be something else !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Why is this hard to understand ???
 
  • Like
Reactions: coachperk
I'm quite certain this doesn't exist. This a phobia and attempt to scare you. There are no sexual predators that dress up like women. It just doesn't happen.

Kind of like they don't become teachers priest or youth counselors or they don't dress up like officers or put police lights on thier cars. They are called sexual predators for a reason and look for any advantage they can to find their next victim.
 
You don't really think this is the same person do you. But NM and Rumor are one and the same.

I have to go with the belief cowherd and Neutron are one in the same. I thought Rumor at first too, but over time Neutron takes the exact stance as cowherd and the same defense as he does and based on cowherd chosen field and I believe he worked or still does at a nuclear facility, so Neutron monster would be up his field. I think he created that so somebody would always agree with him...
 
  • Like
Reactions: coachperk
I'm quite honored you guys think we're the same. NM consistently has the smartest takes on this board.
 
Cite a single example of someone being sexually assaulted by a transgender person in a restroom. No one has ever come up with one. There is no threat that people are being protected from. This is fearmongering to justify discrimination

This not from a restroom but here is your example....you might want to google things before you spout off about something.

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/art...le-prison-GUILTY-raping-teenage-girl-man.html

A transgender rapist has been sent to a male prison after she was found guilty of raping a 'vulnerable' schoolgirl.

  • Davina Ayrton convicted of sexual attack on a 15-year-old schoolgirl
  • Ayrton pinned victim on a sofa while they where drinking in a garage
  • She will be held at Winchester male prison until sentencing on March 4
  • Court heard how she admitted possession of indecent images of children
 
  • Like
Reactions: coachperk
I'm quite certain this doesn't exist. This a phobia and attempt to scare you. There are no sexual predators that dress up like women. It just doesn't happen.

Here you got my friend again google is your friend you might want to try it.

http://www.nbcdfw.com/news/local/Transgender-Woman-Convictions-Irrelevant-to-Citation-149923975.html

Transgender Woman: Convictions Irrelevant to Citation
Witherspoon convicted in 1990 for sexual assault of child, indecency with child

This is a first class dirtbag of the highest order. A level III sex offender is considered a major risk for society with a high propensity to commit another sex crime. Paul(a)'s crime was Sexual Assault of a minor which in this case was a 14 year old girl and also indecency of a child with sexual contact with a 15 year old girls. He is a predator of young women.

This person belongs on the Television Show "World's Dumbest Criminals" based on the stupidity of first claiming she was visiting her husband that had a heart attack with the veracity of that yet to be determined and then claiming to carry a letter from the VA stating she was transsexual. The letter this douche-bag posted was dated April 27 which is 2 days after the Parkland Hospital incident and specifically mentions parkland Hospital.

The truth will come out is so relevant here. Some in the transgender community are still trying to claim her rights were violated but this is a clear example of a registered sex offender entering women's spaces and with the recidivism rates of Level II sex offenders this woman did what she thought was correct as should be her right.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: coachperk
Cow , aka, (NM),
I have never put anyone on ignore, but u 2, I mean you 1 , are close. Your PC, BS , holier than thou attitude is getting hard to bear.

NOBODY wants to shower with a dyke or a homo or a wanna be something else !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Why is this hard to understand ???
Then don't shower with them, no one is forcing you to do anything
 
This not from a restroom but here is your example....you might want to google things before you spout off about something.

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/art...le-prison-GUILTY-raping-teenage-girl-man.html

A transgender rapist has been sent to a male prison after she was found guilty of raping a 'vulnerable' schoolgirl.

  • Davina Ayrton convicted of sexual attack on a 15-year-old schoolgirl
  • Ayrton pinned victim on a sofa while they where drinking in a garage
  • She will be held at Winchester male prison until sentencing on March 4
  • Court heard how she admitted possession of indecent images of children
What exactly is your point? One person committed a rape? How many straight men committed rapes last year? Are you going to ban them from contact with minors?

This citation has NOTHING to do with these sorts of laws. When this is what you have to cite, it shows how these laws don't have a real problem they are solving - it's all about discrimination
 
I have to go with the belief cowherd and Neutron are one in the same. I thought Rumor at first too, but over time Neutron takes the exact stance as cowherd and the same defense as he does and based on cowherd chosen field and I believe he worked or still does at a nuclear facility, so Neutron monster would be up his field. I think he created that so somebody would always agree with him...
Considering people know who cowherd is, it should be pretty obvious that we're not the same person given our jobs/background.
 
I have to go with the belief cowherd and Neutron are one in the same. I thought Rumor at first too, but over time Neutron takes the exact stance as cowherd and the same defense as he does and based on cowherd chosen field and I believe he worked or still does at a nuclear facility, so Neutron monster would be up his field. I think he created that so somebody would always agree with him...
I will bet the farm that they are different people. I will also bet NM and Rumor are one and the same. My guess is Rumor is log in, and stays logged in, on his cell or a different computer, or vise versa and so it depends where he is posting from. But cow is neither one. They are probably from different parts of the state. I wish veer would chime in, he keeps pretty good track of these things. He could be a FBI profiler.:D
 
I will bet the farm that they are different people. I will also bet NM and Rumor are one and the same. My guess is Rumor is log in, and stays logged in, on his cell or a different computer, or vise versa and so it depends where he is posting from. But cow is neither one. They are probably from different parts of the state. I wish veer would chime in, he keeps pretty good track of these things. He could be a FBI profiler.:D
Do you work for the government and have access to my phones and computers??? That was way too accurate
 
Do you work for the government and have access to my phones and computers??? That was way too accurate
If you had been on here a little longer you would KNOW Rumor and NM are the same person. He even spoke about it on here not too long ago.
 
Rumor and NM are for sure 1 person.

I was just hoping him and WC were the same cause having 2 of them would be.....
 
Rumor and NM are for sure 1 person.

I was just hoping him and WC were the same cause having 2 of them would be.....

As someone who's been posting on here for a long time (different names) I can guarantee they aren't the same person. Also, given your language on the subject, please don't try to pretend your arguments stem from anything other than bigotry.
 
As someone who's been posting on here for a long time (different names) I can guarantee they aren't the same person. Also, given your language on the subject, please don't try to pretend your arguments stem from anything other than bigotry.

If not wanting to use the restroom or shower with a homosexual makes me a bigot,........... I guess I'm a bigot.
 
  • Like
Reactions: coachperk
If not wanting to use the restroom or shower with a homosexual makes me a bigot,........... I guess I'm a bigot.
You don't want to be in the same bathroom with a homosexual?

Do you get out much?
 
You don't want to be in the same bathroom with a homosexual?

Do you get out much?

No, given the choice, I would rather use the same restroom with people that aren't trying to sneak a peek at my junk.

Do I get out much? I guess that depends on your definition. Here in north Missouri, we don't run into too many homosexuals, not knowingly anyway.
 
The honus for such studies is on people who want to limit access/behavior, not the other way around

No, it's not.

Men have always went to the men's room.
Women have always went to the women's room.

Now weirdo's want to go wherever they want. They should prove it won't cause a problem.
Normal people shouldn't have to prove that it will.

You seem to be good at wanting other people to prove their point, but not so much the other way. Cow made the statement that homosexuals wouldn't want to see my junk, now let him prove it.
 
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest posts

ADVERTISEMENT