69%
- Thread starter Duck_walk
- Start date
source? I'm fine with witnesses. I want the whole truth...every side, every detail...all of it.
For the sake of argument, even though we can't trust polls lets say this one is accurate. The democrats want to decide who is important to question. Lev, Guliani, Bolton are all-important according to Dems on FTN TV. Biden and Biden's son Hunter is not important. Why is that? Why is the center of the subject being dismissed by these so-called justice seekers? If asked, Guliani, Lev, and Bolton have all said they will testify. I haven't heard about Pompeo.
Everything the remaining Dems say (Schumer, Schiff, Biden, Nadler) wants now is the polar opposite of what they said about the Clinton Impeachment trial. BTW Clinton was acquitted even though he perjured himself.
Everything the remaining Dems say (Schumer, Schiff, Biden, Nadler) wants now is the polar opposite of what they said about the Clinton Impeachment trial. BTW Clinton was acquitted even though he perjured himself.
Last edited:
Yep. If polled I would say yes too. There are a few witnesses i'd like to hear from too. I've always said the Dems don't want a real trial because their witnesses have no evidence. The witnesses the Pubs call would be real drama and Trump can still use executive privilege to protect confidential meetings.
Yes, but a good chunk of those are people that would like to see Hunter Biden ...and probably old hair sniffing miner coder testify as well. If Hunter testifies there will be Dems scurrying off that sinking ship left and right.
I have no problem with witness....but all the witness have to come forth, the Senate get's to decide what witness will be called put under oath and then talk. I'd call both Bidens...Hunter and his dad. The way ole Joe Biden tongue ties himself with stuff it would be Wonderful to watch. The Dem's only want to call who they want to testify they have Zero interest in having others called.
As I said, i'd like to have witnesses but the Dems only want witnesses they think will invoke executive privilege so they can continue the narrative or meld it into the next collusion/Russia/Mueller/extortion/Stormy/Ukraine narrative. They really don't care about any of these things but just want the narrative. Allowing fishing expedition witnesses enables that.
The number one rule on witnesses is never call one you don't know what their testimony is going to be. The Dems have no idea what Bolton etc. will testify to so, they don't really want them (likely would lose in court on executive privilege) but want the narrative. If they wanted them, they would go the court route to get it.
